• News
    • News & Views
    • RGME Activities for 2024 and 2025
    • Around & About with the RGME
    • Reviews
    • Highlights
  • Blogs
    • Manuscript Studies
      • Manuscript Studies: Contents List
    • International Congress on Medieval Studies
      • Abstracts of Congress Papers
        • Abstracts of Papers Listed by Author
        • Abstracts of Papers Listed by Year
  • About
    • Mission
    • Who We Are
      • Officers, Associates & Volunteers
      • RGME Committees
      • Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence
    • Policies & Statements
      • RGME Privacy Policy Statement
      • RGME Intellectual Property Statement & Agreements
    • People
      • Mildred Budny — Her Page
      • Adelaide Bennett Hagens
    • Activities
      • Events
      • Congress Activities
        • Sponsored Conference Sessions (1993‒)
          • Panels at the M-MLA Convention (from 2016)
        • Co-sponsored Conference Sessions (2006‒)
    • History
      • Seals, Matrices & Documents
      • Genealogies & Archives
    • Contact Us
  • Bembino
    • Multi-Lingual Bembino
    • RGME Bembino: Resources
  • Congress
    • Sponsored Conference Sessions (1993‒)
    • Co-sponsored Conference Sessions (2006‒)
    • Abstracts of Congress Papers
      • Abstracts Listed by Author
      • Abstracts Listed by Year
    • Kalamazoo Archive
    • Panels at the M-MLA Convention (2016-2019)
      • Abstracts of Papers for the M-MLA Convention
      • Panels at the M-MLA Convention (from 2016)
  • Events
    • RGME Activities for 2024 and 2025
      • 2023 Activities and 2024 Planned Activities
    • Seminars, Workshops, Colloquia & Symposia (1989–)
      • Seminars on ‘The Evidence of Manuscripts’
      • Symposia on ‘The Transmission of the Bible’
      • The New Series (2001-)
        • 2019 Anniversary Symposium Program: The Roads Taken
        • 2019 Anniversary Symposium Registration
        • 2019 Anniversary Symposium Registration Open
      • RGME Symposia: The Various Series
      • The Research Group Speaks: The Series
      • Meetings of the Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence
      • RGME Online Events
    • Abstracts of Papers for Events
      • Abstracts of Papers for Seminars on ‘The Evidence of Manuscripts’
      • Abstracts of Papers for Symposia, Workshops & Colloquia
    • Receptions & Parties
    • Business Meetings
    • Photographic Exhibitions & Master Classes
    • Events Archive
  • ShelfLife
    • Journal Description
    • ShelfMarks: The RGME-Newsletter
    • Publications
      • “Insular, Anglo-Saxon, and Early Anglo-Norman Manuscript Art at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge” (1997)
        • Mildred Budny, ‘Catalogue’
        • The Illustrated Catalogue (1997)
      • The Illustrated Handlist
      • Semi-Official Counterfeiting in France 1380-1422
      • No Snap Decisions: Challenges of Manuscript Photography
    • History and Design of Our Website
  • Galleries
    • Watermarks & the History of Paper
    • Galleries: Contents List
    • Scripts on Parade
    • Texts on Parade
      • Latin Documents & Cartularies
      • New Testament Leaves in Old Armenian
    • Posters on Display
    • Layout Designs
  • Donations and Contributions
    • RGME Donor Promise
    • 2023 End-of-Year Fundraiser for our 2024 Anniversary Year
    • 2019 Anniversary Appeal
    • Orders
  • Links
    • Catalogs, Metadata, and Databases: A Handlist of Links
    • Handlist of Resources for Manuscript Studies and Fragmentology
    • Manuscripts & Rare Books
    • Maps, Plans & Drawings
    • Seals, Seal-Matrices & Documents

  • News
    • News & Views
    • RGME Activities for 2024 and 2025
    • Around & About with the RGME
    • Reviews
    • Highlights
  • Blogs
    • Manuscript Studies
      • Manuscript Studies: Contents List
    • International Congress on Medieval Studies
      • Abstracts of Congress Papers
        • Abstracts of Papers Listed by Author
        • Abstracts of Papers Listed by Year
  • About
    • Mission
    • Who We Are
      • Officers, Associates & Volunteers
      • RGME Committees
      • Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence
    • Policies & Statements
      • RGME Privacy Policy Statement
      • RGME Intellectual Property Statement & Agreements
    • People
      • Mildred Budny — Her Page
      • Adelaide Bennett Hagens
    • Activities
      • Events
      • Congress Activities
        • Sponsored Conference Sessions (1993‒)
          • Panels at the M-MLA Convention (from 2016)
        • Co-sponsored Conference Sessions (2006‒)
    • History
      • Seals, Matrices & Documents
      • Genealogies & Archives
    • Contact Us
  • Bembino
    • Multi-Lingual Bembino
    • RGME Bembino: Resources
  • Congress
    • Sponsored Conference Sessions (1993‒)
    • Co-sponsored Conference Sessions (2006‒)
    • Abstracts of Congress Papers
      • Abstracts Listed by Author
      • Abstracts Listed by Year
    • Kalamazoo Archive
    • Panels at the M-MLA Convention (2016-2019)
      • Abstracts of Papers for the M-MLA Convention
      • Panels at the M-MLA Convention (from 2016)
  • Events
    • RGME Activities for 2024 and 2025
      • 2023 Activities and 2024 Planned Activities
    • Seminars, Workshops, Colloquia & Symposia (1989–)
      • Seminars on ‘The Evidence of Manuscripts’
      • Symposia on ‘The Transmission of the Bible’
      • The New Series (2001-)
        • 2019 Anniversary Symposium Program: The Roads Taken
        • 2019 Anniversary Symposium Registration
        • 2019 Anniversary Symposium Registration Open
      • RGME Symposia: The Various Series
      • The Research Group Speaks: The Series
      • Meetings of the Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence
      • RGME Online Events
    • Abstracts of Papers for Events
      • Abstracts of Papers for Seminars on ‘The Evidence of Manuscripts’
      • Abstracts of Papers for Symposia, Workshops & Colloquia
    • Receptions & Parties
    • Business Meetings
    • Photographic Exhibitions & Master Classes
    • Events Archive
  • ShelfLife
    • Journal Description
    • ShelfMarks: The RGME-Newsletter
    • Publications
      • “Insular, Anglo-Saxon, and Early Anglo-Norman Manuscript Art at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge” (1997)
        • Mildred Budny, ‘Catalogue’
        • The Illustrated Catalogue (1997)
      • The Illustrated Handlist
      • Semi-Official Counterfeiting in France 1380-1422
      • No Snap Decisions: Challenges of Manuscript Photography
    • History and Design of Our Website
  • Galleries
    • Watermarks & the History of Paper
    • Galleries: Contents List
    • Scripts on Parade
    • Texts on Parade
      • Latin Documents & Cartularies
      • New Testament Leaves in Old Armenian
    • Posters on Display
    • Layout Designs
  • Donations and Contributions
    • RGME Donor Promise
    • 2023 End-of-Year Fundraiser for our 2024 Anniversary Year
    • 2019 Anniversary Appeal
    • Orders
  • Links
    • Catalogs, Metadata, and Databases: A Handlist of Links
    • Handlist of Resources for Manuscript Studies and Fragmentology
    • Manuscripts & Rare Books
    • Maps, Plans & Drawings
    • Seals, Seal-Matrices & Documents

Log in

Archives

Featured Posts

Episode 24. “Life with Books” (Interview with John Windle)
Announcing the Launch of RGME Bembino WP
2026 RGME Colloquium at The Grolier Club: Report
Medieval Missal Fragment as Early-Modern Cover
The Weber Leaf from Ege MS 61
"Bembino" Booklet Cover
Episode 23. “Meet RGME Bembino: Facets of a Font”
2026 RGME Colloquium on “Transformations & Renewals” at The Grolier Club
2026 Theme of the Year: “Transformations and Renewals”
A Leaf with Patchwork from the Saint Albans Bible
A Sister Leaf from a Miniature Latin Vulgate Bible
A Little Latin Vulgate Bible Manuscript Leaf in Princeton
J. S. Wagner Collection. Leaf from from Prime in a Latin manuscript Breviary. Folio 4 Verso, with part of Psalm 117 (118) in the Vulgate Version, set out in verses with decorated initials.
2026 Annual Appeal
Episode 22: “Encounters with Local Saints and Their Cults”
Private Collection, Ege's FBNC Portfolio, Dante Leaf, Verso, Detail. Reproduced by Permission.
2025 RGME Autumn Colloquium on Fragments
Workshop 8: A Hybrid Book where Medieval Music Meets Early-Modern Herbal
2025 RGME Autumn Symposium on “Readers, Fakers, and Re-Creators of Books”
RGME Workshops on “The Evidence of Manuscripts, Etc.”
2025 International Medieval Congress at Leeds: RGME Program
Episode 21. “Learning How to Look”
2025 International Congress on Medieval Studies: Program
2025 RGME Visit to Vassar College
Two Leaves in the Book of Numbers from the Chudleigh Bible
Delibovi on Glassgold on Boethius: A Blogpost
Ronald Smeltzer on “Émilie du Châtelet, Woman of Science”
2025 Spring Symposium: “Makers, Producers, and Collectors of Books”
Starters’ Orders
The Weber Leaf from the Saint Albans Bible
Workshop 4. “Manuscript Fragments Compared”
Episode 20. “Comic Book Theory for Medievalists”
Episode 19: “At the Gate: Starting the Year 2025 at its Threshold”
Favorite Recipes for Lemonade, Etc.
RGME Visit to the Lomazow Collection: Report
2024 Autumn Symposium: “At the Helm”
A Latin Vulgate Leaf of the Book of Numbers
The RGME ‘Lending Library’
Florence, Italy, Ponte Vecchio from Ponte alle Grazie. Photo: Ingo Mehling, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons
Episode 17. “RGME Retrospect and Prospects: Anniversary Reflections”
2024 Anniversary Symposium: The Booklet
Jesse Hurlbut at the Bonneville Salt Flats, Utah. Photograph Jesse Hurlbut.
Episode 16: An Interview with Jesse D. Hurlbut
To Whom Do Manuscripts Belong?
Kalamazoo, MI Western Michigan University, Valley III from the side. Photograph: David W. Sorenson.
2024 International Congress on Medieval Studies: Report
2024 Spring Symposium at Vassar College
Puente de San Martín: Bridge with reflection over the River Targus, Toledo, Spain.
2024 Grant for “Between Past and Future” Project from The Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation Research Libraries Program
2024 Anniversary Symposium in Thanks to Jesse Hurlbut: Program

You are browsing the Blog for Manuscript Studies

A Latin Vulgate Leaf of the Book of Numbers

September 12, 2024 in Manuscript Studies, RGME Lending Library

A Latin Vulgate Bible Leaf
in the Collection of Jennah Farrell

Part of the Book of Numbers
laid out in double columns of 46 lines in Gothic Script

Visible area within mat:
maximum circa 24.1 cm. tall × 16.3 cm. wide
(circa 9 7/8 in. tall × 6 7/8 in. wide)

< ruled writing area circa 18.7 × 12.5 cm.
(7 3/4 × 4 7/8 in.)

[Posted on 11 September 2024]

After introducing you to the RGME “Lending Library”, we turn to a “New Loan” mentioned in that blogpost. Sent to the RGME for study, the loan comprises a single vellum leaf from a medieval Latin Vulgate Bible manuscript which the present owner acquired in its frame among a former owner’s belongings.

The new owner approached the RGME Director on the strength of one of our blogposts.  The leaf has been sent on loan to the RGME in June 2024.  With permission, we report results as we continue to study the leaf and its context. Later we will remove the leaf from its modern frame and reveal more discoveries.

First Steps

Private Collection. Framed Bible Leaf in its Wrapping for Transit to the RGME in July 2024: View upon arrival in unpacking the leaf. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

Work on the leaf after it had safely arrived, in secure packing, had to wait while disruptions to the RGME website and a cluster of other unexpected issues intervened, requiring attention. Resuming work (as you can see, our website is back in accessible working order), we begin our report on the leaf with this blogpost. It sets the scene and shows first photographs of the leaf still in its frame, to introduce the leaf to you.

At present, the leaf remains in its frame, while we study its visible features and explore its context. Then we will, with permission, remove the leaf from the frame, to photograph and study its other side and outer edges now hidden below the windowed opening of the mat and by the back of the frame.

The Visible Text: Recto or Verso?

The leaf stands in the windowed glass frame in which it reached its current owner.  On partly puckered vellum, the text in Latin presents part of the Old Testament Book of Numbers in the Vulgate Version.

Collection of Jennah Farrell, Manuscript Leaf in Frame: Front, emerging from packaging upon arrival for study. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

The back of the frame has few identifying features.  Besides the metal hanging wire and its pair of mounts, its black paper covering has the traces of a removed label formerly centered at one end and a companion nail taped off-center to the opposite end.

Collection of Jennah Farrell, Manuscript Leaf: Back of Frame emerging from packaging. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

Through the glass of the frame, most of one side of the leaf can be seen, with its outer edges on all sides covered to some extent by the windowed mat.
The visible extent of the leaf within the mat measures a maximum of circa 24.1 cm. tall × 16.3 cm. wide (circa 9 7/8 in. tall × 6 7/8 in. wide).  The ruled writing area measures circa 18.7 × 12.5 cm. (7 3/4 × 4 7/8 in.). As presented to view, the full extent can be seen of the two columns of script and most of the appendages and additional elements which accompany it as navigation aids. The latter include the running title, inset chapter numerals, and decorative embellishments.

Collection of Jennah Farrell, Manuscript Leaf in Mat. Photograph by Jennah Farrrell.

The Text, Decoration, and Layout

Written in Gothic script, the text in Latin is laid out in two columns of 46 lines each: columns a at the left and b at the right.  To the left of each column stands a decorative vertical bar extending the full height of the column and reaching into the upper and lower margins of the page, with foliate extensions branching sideways in both directions.
Inset decorative 2-line text initials, set in sub-rectangular gold frames, attach to the right-hand sides of the columnar bars, with one per column.  With the identifying Roman chapter-numbers written in Capitals against decorated backgrounds at the ends of the preceding lines, these initials open Chapters XIX and XX in the Old Testament Book of Numbers.
In the top line of each column, an extended letter rises to a leftward-facing head in profile: animal in column a and male with extended pointed cap in column b.

Collection of Jennah Farrell, Manuscript Leaf in Mat: top left. Photograph by Jennah Farrrell.

The running title at the top, set within parallel lines ruled in drypoint, identifies the text with “RI” in Capitals.  Expecting the first part of the word “NUME” on the facing verso of the original manuscript, this would be the recto.

Collection of Jennah Farrell, Manuscript Leaf in Frame: Top right. Photograph by Jennah Farrrell.

The text on the page starts in Numbers 18:27 of the Latin Vulgate version: “. . . [oblati]onem primitovorum.  Tam de areis quam“.  “XIX” marks the start of Numbers 19: “Locutus est dominus ad moysen“.  There then follows a long list of rules about becoming ‘unclean’ after touching a dead body.
“XX” marks the start of Numbers 20: “Veneruntque filii israel“.  The page ends in 20:5 “. . . et aquam non [/ habet ad bibendum]”, expected to continue on the verso.  The last line has “malagranata“, the Latin for “pomegranates”.
The left-facing man’s head at the top of col.b does not appear to be at a significant point in the text.  It stands in the middle of 19:13 against an extended tall-s of “asp[er]sus“.  The text:
[13] omnis qui tetigerit humanae animae morticinum et aspersus hac commixtione non fuerit polluet tabernaculum Domini et peribit ex Israhel quia aqua expiationis non est aspersus inmundus erit et manebit spurcitia eius super eum
[13] Every one that toucheth the corpse of a man, and is not sprinkled with mixture, shall profane the tabernacle of the Lord, and shall perish out of Israel: because he was not sprinkled with the water of expiation, he shall be unclean, and his uncleanness shall remain upon him.

Show-Through and the Other Side

Show-through from the verso reveal features of ink and pigment which diverge from those on the recto.  For example:
1) parts of the running title likewise in Capitals (the letters NUME would be expected);
2) a vertical bar down the intercolumn edging column b, but not one for column a
3) an inset 2-line initial with sub-rectangular frame in column b at the start of lines 23–24 (presumably the q for Quod for Numbers chapter 21); and
4) foliate extensions across most of the lower margin, but not reaching into its span below the inner or outer margins, unlike the formation from the bar for column a on the recto.
Let us see what becomes revealed with the leaf is removed from its frame.  That step comes later, to be revealed in another blogpost.
Meanwhile, we could take as educated ‘predictions’ of what to expect such evidence as the show-through of features from the verso and the place in the course of the known text where column b on the recto breaks off mid-phrase. This process could serve as a useful teaching exercise.
For example, the other side holds evidence which can become available to view once outside the frame. It could correct or confirm our conjectures about its features as we examine the visible recto before then.
How accurate are these conjectures? Let’s see!

More to Come

Watch this space.  A next blogpost would reveal more as our research continues.

Update: See our next blogpost and join a pair of Workshops on “Looking at Manuscripts”, dedicated to this Leaf. Would you like to help us to identify it? Come and learn how!

  • Latin Vulgate Bible Leaf in the Collection of Jennah Farrell: Part 2

Comments? Join the Journey!

Do you recognize this manuscript? Are you familiar with other leaves from it? Please let us know.

Please Contact Us or visit

  • our FaceBook Page
  • our Facebook Group
  • our Twitter Feed (@rgme_mss)
  • our Bluesky nest @rgmesocial.bluesky.social)
  • our LinkedIn Group
  • our Blog on Manuscript Studies and its Contents List

Would you like to help? Donations and contributions, in funds or in kind, are welcome and easy to give.  Given our low overheads, your donations have direct impact on our work and the furtherance of our mission.  For our Section 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational organization, your donations may be tax-deductible to the fullest extent permitted by law.  Thank you for your support!

  • Contributions and Donations
  • 2024 Anniversary Appeal

We look forward to hearing from you.

*****

Tags: Collection of Jennah Farrell, Latin Vulgate Bibles, manuscript fragments, Manuscript studies, Old Testament Book of Numbers
No Comments »

The RGME ‘Lending Library’

September 5, 2024 in Manuscript Studies, RGME Library & Archives

The RGME ‘Lending Library’

Books, Manuscripts, Fragments,
Documents, Seals and Seal Matrices,
Photographs, Prints and Drawings, and other Original Materials

Sometimes the Sources come to visit
the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence

Sometimes our Materials go to visit
for workshops, exhibitions, and study

[Posted on 4 September 2024, with updates]

Dialogues of Gregory the Great, Book III, chapter XIII initial, reproduced by permission

Manuscript Leaf with Dialogues of Gregory the Great, Book III, chapter 13 initial, while on loan. Photography by Mildred Budny.

Over the years, private collectors, scholars, students, and others continue to seek advice and expertise from the Research Group about manuscript, printed, documentary, and other materials in their possession. Indeed, our mission seeks to examine original sources of written works and their relatives by a dedicated process of “Going to the Sources”. (On this mission, see, for example, our 2024 Spring Symposium at Vassar College.)

Often the sources, or their surrogates in photographic and other means, come to us. Sometimes they come to stay, as gifts. Sometimes they come on loan.

How do they find us? They do so as their owners or researchers approach us from learning about the RGME and our wide range of interests and network of contacts, whether through our scholarly events (in person or online) or by word of mouth, posts on social media, or our blog on Manuscript Studies. Then they make contact to ask if we might be interested in looking at the item(s) in question. They send photographs to show the characteristics of the materials, and generously allow us to work with the evidence in their care, whether as gifts or through photographs or loans of the items.

Sometimes the owners generously loan original materials to the RGME for research, conservation, photography, and publication. This process can yield remarkable results.

Preparing now for our 2024 Autumn Symposium showcasing the work and potential of Special Collections of many kinds for teaching, it seems time to describe the years’-long tradition of sharing materials and expertise through the RGME Lending Library. (You are Here.)

Multi-Directional

Sometimes, in turn, we bring original materials — in our own collection, our Director’s, and other collections — to the attention of audiences in various locations, as we might take them for exhibitions, workshops, seminars, tutorials, research consultations, and teaching/learning opportunities. Sometimes this comprises displays at Receptions for our Symposia, and informal, sometimes ad-hoc, gatherings, such as at Sessions or Receptions at the International Congress on Medieval Studies.

David Sorenson and Donncha MacGabhann examine manuscript materials

David Sorenson and Donnach MacGabhann examine manuscript materials after the RGME Writing Materials Session at the 2014 Congress. Photography by Mildred Budny

One of the most memorable on our roster of events over the years was the 2014 Seminar on site at the Index of Christian Art to consider selected examples (manuscripts, fragments, and documents) from a Private Collection on loan to the RGME for some years.

  • 2014 Seminar on Manuscripts and Their Photographs at the Index of Christian Art
    (now the Index of Medieval Art)
Inspecting the despoiled Book of Hours at our 'Show & Tell' Seminar on Manuscripts & Their Photographs on 9 December 2014

Observing the Book of Hours at the 2014 Seminar

Images

Private Collection, Back Endpaper for Printed Postilla.

Private Collection, Back Endpaper for Printed Postilla: Watermark of Pilgrim with staff.

Sending photographs to us gives information about the item(s). Having a look, we might propose to help and also, if permission is granted, to ask others within our circles about further information in the areas, regions, subjects, languages, genres of objects, and contexts to which the materials pertain. For example, over the years, sharing photographs from a single private collection has, with permission, generated reports on a wide variety of items on paper and vellum or parchment, manuscript or printed, from many places of origin and in diverse languages.

Sometimes the approach concerns an object which relates to materials which we have already researched and published. Among them are fragments from specific medieval manuscripts or printed materials dispersed by Otto F. Ege (1888–1951) which our research has explored; and fragments from other manuscripts or printed materials also dispersed by Ege alone or in  compilations of Portfolios of fragments reused as specimens intended for teaching and display.  Sometimes (as with some of those cases), as time goes on and opportunity arises, travel permitting, we have the chance to see the originals which have become familiar through our research work from photographs.

'New Leaves' from Ege Manuscript 41, Verso, and from Ege Manuscript 51, Recto, viewed in November 2016. Photograph by Mildred Budny

‘New Leaves’ from Ege Manuscript 41, Verso, and from Ege Manuscript 51, Recto, viewed in November 2016. Photograph by Mildred Budny

Sometimes the collector’s initial approach to us about a specimen broaches a book or fragment of some other kind, in case our sphere of interests and contacts might bring enlightenment.

An example is the query several years ago from a collector abroad about a South Asian manuscript newly acquired from a friend; the language was unfamiliar; might we know what the book is?  The process of constructive, and amiable, collaborative inquiry led, with generous permission, to two blogposts which offer instruction about the book and its place within widespread practices in the book-trading world for tourists who may have little knowledge about the genre of book and its integrity as an object.

Often, as in that case, our research work progresses with the photographic representatives of the materials generously supplied by the owners.  Sometimes, as we explore together, the others take more photographs to illustrate specific features or produce diagrams for ruling patterns, folds, and alignment of the insides and outsides of bifolia within the original book.

On Site

Sometimes the owners generously send the materials themselves on loan to the Research Group, for detailed study in person, over a period of time. This loan enables detailed examination, photography, research, consultation, and refinement of results, whereupon the materials return to their owners or transfer to new ownership according to the owners’ directions.

Sometimes, if wished and permitted by the owner, the period of loan includes the conservation work, such as removal from non-archival frames or boxes, rematting, reframing, and/or placement in archival housing for storage, handling, or display.

Full-page, framed illustration of the Mass of Saint Gregory on a detached leaf from a prayerbook. Photography © Mildred Budny

Private Collection, Vellum leaf with illustration of “Gregory Mass”, verso. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

With these opportunities, close inspection is possible under various lights and angles of vision. These multiple approaches can be done in the presence of the object. Such variety can reveal features not necessarily clear or apparent in digital reproductions of single views, however high-quality they might be and capable of showing details under high magnification.

Gold Leaf partly lifted. Photography © Mildred Budny

Private Collection, Vellum leaf with illustration of “Gregory Mass”, verso: detail of lower border. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

Results

Front Cover for Report by Leslie J. French for Wagner Leaf from Ege MS 22 (2021)

Front Cover for Report by Leslie J. French for Wagner Leaf from Ege MS 22 (2021)

The quests can result — depending upon the materials and their context, the time available or required for research and write-up, and the choices for presentation of the results — variously in RGME blogposts, presentations for symposia, conference sessions, or other scholarly events, exhibition displays, RGME Research Booklets, and a combination of these.

With these presentations and publications, knowledge about the original materials can reach a wide audience, and add to knowledge about their contexts, including relatives among surviving witnesses to their periods and places of production, makers, owners, readers, collectors, collections, and other features.

Examples

So far, the range of materials is exemplified by a range of publications of materials from private collections, named or anonymous. Sometimes the publications include or represent materials in institutions, such as university or public libraries.  Named private collections represented include:

Collection of Birgitt G. Lopez, Framed Leaf from ‘Otto Ege Manuscript 14’. Leaf in Frame. Reproduced by permission.

Birgitt G. Lopez Collection

  • Two Ege Leaves and Two Ege Labels in the Collection of Brigitt G. Lopez
  • Another Leaf from a Portable Manuscript Bible in the Collection of Birgitt G. Lopez

Brent Rosenbrook Collection

  • A Leaf of Deuteronomy from ‘Otto Ege Manuscript 14’ in the Rosenbrook Collection

Ronald K. Smeltzer Collection

  • Vellum Binding Fragments in a Parisian Printed Book of 1538

Stephen Soderlind Collection

  • A Detached Folio 108 with Part of Vulgate Psalm 118 (117)
Camelite Booklet Cover Page with New Front Cover with border

Camelite Booklet Cover Page with New Front Cover with border

J.S. Wagner Collection

  • The Penitent King David from a Book of Hours
  • A Leaf from ‘Otto Ege Manuscript 19’ and Ege’s Workshop Practices
  • Another Leaf from the Warburg Missal
  • Carmelite Missal Leaf of 1509

Robert Weber Collection

  • A Leaf from ‘Otto Ege Manuscript 214’ in the Collection of Robert Weber
  • Portfolio 93 of Ege’s “Famous Books in Eight Centuries (FBEC)” in the Collection of Richard Weber

Two cases from the J.S. Wagner Collection represent:

1) The opening of one of the Penitential Psalms (with the Penitent King David) from the Psalter

  • The Penitent King David from a Book of Hours
J. S. Wagner Collection. Detached Manuscript Detached Leaf with the Opening in Latin of the Penitent Psalm 37 (38) and its Illustration of King David.

J. S. Wagner Collection. Detached Manuscript Leaf with the Opening in Latin of the Penitent Psalm 37 (38) and its Illustration of King David.

2) The opening of the Old Testament Book of Macabees in a Bible manuscript disbound and distributed by Otto F. Ege

  • A Leaf from ‘Otto Ege Manuscript 19’ and Ege’s Workshop Practices
Opening of the Book of Macabees in Otto Ege MS 19. Private Collection.

Wagner Collection. Opening of the Book of Macabees in Otto Ege MS 19.

Books and Fragments

Examples include

1) books and fragments from a single private assembly in the Illustrated Handlist, including specimens which we were asked to remove from their damaging modern frames for conservation and archival mounting.

Book of Hours with floral border. Photography by Mildred Budny.

2) manuscripts, fragments, documents, printed materials, and other media in various private collections as represented in our blog on Manuscript Studies; and

Preston Charters Dorses. Photograph Mildred Budny. Numbers added to the photograph report the present owner's numbering for the set, from 5 to 7 and 9 to 13.

Private Collection. “Preston Charters” Faces. Photograph Mildred Budny.

3) books or part-books, such as a disordered and reassembled Sinalese palm-leaf manuscript (with its reworked cover), which our study could reconstruct in part:

  • A Sinhalese Palm-Leaf Manuscript in Deconstructed and Reconstructed Order:
    Part 1 of 2.
  • More Leaves from a Deconstructed Sinhalese Palm-Leaf Manuscript: Part 2 of 2.
Private Collection, Sinhalese Palm-Leaf Manuscript, Reconstructed View of Former Leaf ('30A' + 26A').

Private Collection, Sinhalese Palm-Leaf Manuscript, Reconstructed View of Former Leaf (’30A’ + 26A’).

Books and Fragments On Loan

In some cases, the current owner’s curiosity about materials in his or her collection leads to the loan to the Research Group or its Director to enable direct examination, which can be an optimal circumstance for research.

1. The Illustrated Handlist

For example, the extended loans over several years (in stages) to the Director for conservation, photography, and research of materials in a private collection — comprising an assembly of manuscript, documentary, and early printed materials — provided the impetus for interim and cumulative reports in scholarly events of several kinds, such as conference or symposium sessions, and an RGME seminar at Princeton University.

Justinian Wrapper folded from back with flap.

Budny Handlist 7: Folder from Back with Flap.

  • 2014 Seminar on Manuscripts and Their Photographs at the Index of Christian Art of Princeton University
    (now the Index of Medieval Art)

For the range of that assembly, now dispersed in different directions, see

  • the Illustrated Handlist.

For example: It’s a Wrap.

Exterior of Justinian Wrapper Unfolded. Photography © Mildred Budny

Outside of Wrapper = Recto of Leaf

2. A Hybrid Book with Two Layers of Manuscripts

Another extended loan from another private collector in 2022–2023 generously brought a remarkable hybrid book, comprising a sandwiched set of vellum leaves within a limp-vellum binding, to the RGME for close inspection over months. The experience, with different forms of lighting (natural, artificial, enhanced), including back-lighting and side-lighting, made it possible to examine multiple aspects of the book which combines two layers produced in the scholastic period of the High Middle Ages and in the Counter Reformation respectively.  In time, when appropriate, we hope to describe the characteristics of this book and the results of our research.

3. The New Loan of a Manuscript Fragment (2024)

A new loan in 2024 brings a medieval manuscript leaf, in its frame, for study and publication, with permission, before its return.  See below for a first glimpse as our study begins.

 

 

Opening between the Front Flyleaf, Verso, and Folio 1 recto, opening Part A.

Opening between the Front Flyleaf, Verso, and Folio 1 recto, opening Part A (“Albertus Magnus”). Photography Mildred Budny.

Up Close

Le Parc Abbey, Theological Volume, Part A, gutter. Photography Mildred Budny.

The opportunity to study these varied materials at close hand and over extended periods of time, as the research advanced and there emerged new discoveries, including by other scholars on related subjects and materials (such as the manuscripts dispersed by Otto F. Ege), spurred the creation of the RGME blog on Manuscript Studies and provided case-studies for multiple  blogposts.

Often these reports have newly discovered results augmenting knowledge about the object, its original state, and its context. They appear on our website as blogposts about individual items or groups of items; a webpage for the The Illustrated Handlist of a single assembly of items; and reports in other forms, including presentations as scholarly events, their publications, and exhibitions both in person and online.  Cases include:

  • Manuscript Studies: Contents List
  • The Illustrated Handlist
  • 2014 Seminar on Manuscripts and Their Photographs at the Index of Christian Art
    (now the Index of Medieval Art)

We give thanks to the collectors who send photographs of their materials and those who lend materials to the RGME for study, learning, and teaching for audiences near and far.

Private Collection, Book of Hours, Decorated Initial and Stub from Despoiled Leaf. Photography Mildred Budny.

Our Records of Earlier States, now Lost

In some cases, as the lent items after their return have transferred to new ownership from the private collections through which we met them, they have undergone transformations in themselves.  In such cases, it can be fortunate that our research has reported their previous stages, as some evidence has been destroyed in new ownership. See, for example, the separation in 2023 of a composite medieval manuscript from Le Parc Abbey, Belgium, into two parts with the removal and loss of the binding given by its original institution.

As a result, our blogposts preserve records of lost evidence.  Perforce, because of our care to record and report the evidence of the original item, in so far as time and resources allow, elements in our photographs, notes, descriptions, and reports reach the level of ‘primary evidence’ or surrogates for evidence in the originals which has been lost.

Opening between the Front Flyleaf, Verso, and Folio 1 recto, opening Part A.

Opening between the Front Flyleaf, Verso, and Folio 1 recto, opening Part A (“Albertus Magnus”). Photography Mildred Budny.

A New Loan

A new loan to the RGME for examination brings a single vellum leaf from a medieval manuscript, which the present owner recently acquired from a former owner’s belongings in its frame with mat.  The new owner approached the RGME Director on the strength of one of our blogposts.  With permission, the leaf has been sent on loan to the RGME in June 2024.

Private Collection. Framed Bible Leaf in its Wrapping for Transit to the RGME in July 2024: View upon arrival in unpacking the leaf. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

Work on the leaf after it had safely arrived, in secure packing, had to wait while disruptions to the RGME website and a cluster of other unexpected issues intervened, requiring attention. Resuming work (as you can see, our website is back in accessible working order), we begin our report on the leaf with this blogpost. It sets the scene and shows first photographs of the leaf still in its frame, to introduce the leaf to you.

At present, the leaf remains in its frame, while we study its visible features and explore its context. Then we will, with permission, remove the leaf from the frame, to photograph and study its other side and outer edges now hidden below the windowed opening of the mat and by the back of the frame.

The Visible Text: Recto or Verso?

The leaf stands in the windowed glass frame in which it reached its current owner.

Collection of Jennah Farrell, Manuscript Leaf in Frame: Front, emerging from packaging upon arrival for study. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

The back of the frame has few identifying features.  Its black paper covering has the traces of a removed label formerly centered at the bottom and a companion picture nail taped off-center at the top.

Collection of Jennah Farrell, Manuscript Leaf: Back of Frame. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

The visible extent of the leaf within the mat measures a maximum of circa 24.1 cm. tall × 16.3 cm. wide (circa 9 7/8 in. tall × 6 7/8 in. wide).  The ruled writing area measures circa 18.7 × 12.5 cm. (7 3/4 × 4 7/8 in.).

Collection of Jennah Farrell, Manuscript Leaf in Mat. Photograph by Jennah Farrrell.

Before the leaf is removed from its frame, the visible features of the leaf within the windowed mat must speak for themselves.
We might use this condition as a teaching exercise or opportunity, to see how much we might learn about the leaf from this perspective, before approaching its other side and the edges of the sheet which lie behind the mat and which remain hidden beneath the back covering of the frame. How much can it tell us in this state, before we move to the next?

Collection of Jennah Farrell, Manuscript Leaf in Mat: top left. Photograph by Jennah Farrrell.

More to Come

Watch this space, as a next blogpost will examine the leaf in its own right.  Join the quest!

Update (11 September 2024):  Now see:

  • A Latin Vulgate Leaf from the Book of Numbers in the Collection of Jennah Farrell (Part 1)
  • Latin Vulgate Bible Leaf in the Collection of Jennah Farrell: Part 2
  • The Latin Vulgate Bible Leaf in the Farrell Collection, Part 3: The Full Leaf

P.S. Do you recognize this manuscript? Are you familiar with other leaves from it? Please let us know.

Please Contact Us or visit

  • our FaceBook Page
  • our Facebook Group
  • our Twitter Feed (@rgme_mss)
  • our Bluesky nest @rgmesocial.bluesky.social)
  • our LinkedIn Group
  • our Blog on Manuscript Studies and its Contents List

We look forward to hearing from you.

Update: Our work with these lent or donated materials has developed into a series of online collaborative workshops. See:

  • RGME Workshops on “The Evidence of Manuscripts, Etc.”

*****

Tags: Manuscript studies, Otto F. Ege, RGME Lending Library, RGME Library & Archives, The Illustated Handlist
No Comments »

2024 Anniversary Survey

August 14, 2024 in Announcements, Manuscript Studies, Surveys

RGME
2024 Anniversary Survey

[Posted on 14 August 2024]

In our 2024 Anniversary Year, we invite you to fill out a short Survey, to gather feedback and help us guide future activities of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence. In tune with the year’s Theme of Bridges, the Survey builds a bridge between the organizational groundwork of the RGME and our audience near and far, as we move toward the future. The Survey is open to all.

New York, Morgan Library & Museum, MS M.769, fol. 305v, detail. (Weltchronik or World Chronicle, Regensburg, Germany, 1360). Image © Morgan Library, New York, via https://ica.themorgan.org/manuscript/page/215/143938

The Goals

The results would aid us to learn about your interests and wishes as we:

  1.  launch the Friends of the RGME with meetings, competitions, and prizes to welcome our wider community;
  2.  prepare for our Anniversary Episode in September to celebrate “RGME Retrospect and Prospects” (Episode 17 of our online series “The Research Group Speaks”); and
  3.  assemble an Anniversary Anthology to celebrate our our 2024 Anniversary Year as part of our program of RGME Publications.

Lisbon, Museu Nacional de Arte Antiga: The mid 15th-century Saint Vincent Panels, attributed to Nuno Gonçalves. Image (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3a/Nuno_Gon%C3%A7alves._Paineis_de_S%C3%A3o_Vicente_de_Fora.jpg) via Creative Commons.

We welcome your suggestions and feedback.

Please note that this Survey is designed to gather feedback for our in-house use, to guide our planning better attuned to our community.

Respecting privacy and confidentiality, we might at some time report aggregate views from the Survey, but without giving names. Please feel free to give your responses in confidence.

Please join our explorations of RGME identity, purpose, impact, and futures as we reflect on past accomplishments and explore new content ideas for the direction of future symposia, meetings, and publications.

2024 Survey

The short survey should take less than ten minutes to complete.

Methods

We offer the 2024 Anniversary Survey in two forms, for respondents with or without access to Google Workspace.

  • as an interactive Google Form
  • as a downloadable Word Document
    Please send this completed form in Word as an email attachment 1) to rgme.surveys@gmail.com or 2) by mail to the RGME at 46 Snowden Lane, Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, U.S.A.

Questions or difficulties with the form(s)? 

Ask us!  Let us know via rgme.surveys@gmail.com.

Due Date

A choice of two dates gives the chance first to gather feedback before Episode 17 on 21 September 2024, and then to allow responses from that Episode.

First and Second Rounds

  1. Florence, Italy, Ponte Vecchio from Ponte alle Grazie. Photo: Ingo Mehling, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

    Florence, Italy, Ponte Vecchio from Ponte alle Grazie. Photo: Ingo Mehling, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

    Please aim to complete the Survey by Wednesday, 18 September 2024 at midnight EDT (GMT-4), when its First Round will close.

  2. A chance to complete the Survey in a Second Round will remain open until Sunday, 23 September 2024 at midnight EDT, to give scope to offer feedback after our reflective and celebratory Episode 17.

Thanks

We are grateful for your time and input, and we thank you for your suggestions.

Our Survey Series

New York, Morgan Library & Museum, MS M.769, fol. 305v (Weltchronik or World Chronicle, Regensburg, Germany, 1360). Image © Morgan Library, New York, via https://ica.themorgan.org/manuscript/page/215/143938

This Survey compliments, and advances from, the Surveys respectively for our Editorial Committee and Participants designed by our Associate Jessica L. Savage in 2022.

A report by our Editorial Team about the 2022 RGME Surveys appears in Issue 2 of our eNewsletter ShelfMarks.

  • ShelfMarks, Issue 2 (Volume 2 Number 1 for Winter 2022-2023)

We warmly thank Jessica for her generous contributions to our mission and planning for activities. They are manifested, for example, in those Surveys, which inspired our 2024 Anniversary Survey designed by our Editorial Team this year, including both our

  • Intern Executive Assistant/Associate Hannah Goeselt
    and
  • Intern Executive Assistant Zoey Kambour.

Hannah and Zoey joined these positions in 2024, as part of:

  • our 2024 Project “Between Past and Future” and
  • our co-sponsored Workshop on “Medieval Women’s Networks”.

We give thanks for the advice for the 2024 Survey from the RGME Editorial Committee and other Advisors.

We look forward to learning your responses to our 2024 Anniversary Survey.

Questions? Suggestions?

  • Please leave your comments or questions below
  • Contact Us
  • Send a note to director@manuscriptevidence.org or RGMEevents@gmail.com

Visit our Social Media:

  • our FaceBook Page
  • our Facebook Group
  • our Twitter Feed (@rgme_mss)
  • our Bluesky nest @rgmesocial.bluesky.social)
  • our LinkedIn Group

Join the Friends of the RGME. Send your favorite recipe for Lemonade (and perhaps its Story) for our Competition.

Register for our Events by the RGME Eventbrite Collection.

Iron bridge over the Sava river at Radeče (IG. GRIDL fabrik, 1894). Photograph Petar Milošević (29 September 2020), CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

*****

Tags: 2024 Anniversary Survey, Bridges, Friends of the Reaearch Group on Manuscript Evidence, RGME Anniversary, Survey, The Research Group Speaks
No Comments »

Knowledge Games and Games of Knowledge: An RGME Session for IMC 2025

August 13, 2024 in Announcements, Call for Papers, Conference, Events, International Medieval Congress, Leeds, Manuscript Studies

Call for Papers
“Knowledge Games and Games of Knowledge:
A Global Perspective on
How Manuscripts Conserve and Transmit Ludic Knowledge”

Session
Sponsored by the RGME
IMC Leeds 2025

Organised by Michael A. Conrad
(University of Sankt-Gallen)

[Posted on 13 August 2024]

Following the success of our Inaugural Session at the International Medieval Congress this year, the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence announces its proposed Sessions for the International Medieval Congress to be held at the University of Leeds from 1–10 July 2025.

Paris, Musée Carnavalet, Projet pour le Pont Neuf, circa 1577. Image via Wikimedia via Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported.

Background: 2024

Our 2024 Inaugural Session, co-organised by our Associates Ann Pascoe-van Zyl and Michael Allman Conrad, focused on “Building Bridges ‘Over Troubled Waters'”:

  • 2024 International Medieval Congress at Leeds: 2024

Foreground: 2025

Dublin, Royal Irish Academy, MS 23 E 25, p. 73, top. Image via https://codecs.vanhamel.nl/Dublin,_Royal_Irish_Academy,_MS_23_E_25 via Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0).

For 2025,with the IMC’s Thematic focus of “Worlds of Learning”, the RGME proposes an integrated suite of events comprising a pair of Sessions of papers plus a Roundtable discussion on “Manuscripts as Worlds of Learning”.

  • 2025 International Medieval Congress at Leeds: Call for Papers (Manuscripts as Worlds of Learning)

In addition, following up on a strand in our 2024 Inaugural Session, the RGME also proposes a sponsored session organised by that session’s co-organizer and presenter, Michael Allman Conrad.

The Plan for the Session

“Knowledge Games and Games of Knowledge:
A Global Perspective on
How Manuscripts Conserve and Transmit
Ludic Knowledge”

Recent scholarship has pointed out time and again how much in the Middle Ages games and other joyful pastimes were not only cherished and accepted as an essential part of everyday life, but also well appreciated as educational tools for making difficult lessons more palatable for students.

Some of these educational games have a long tradition, such as rithmomachia, which was used in schools for instruction in the quadrivial arts and still known by scholars of the 17th century. Some disciplines, such as astronomy, even had their own games — in this case, for example, the ludus astrologicus. The knowledge of such elaborate games was transmitted through manuscripts, often as part of miscellanies. Besides, there is no lack of writings dedicated to more profane games either. In fact, there are collections of board games (and other pastimes), with some of these manuscripts showing very rich and ornate embellishments and game diagrams, along with vivid miniatures depicting players in action.

Madrid, Real Biblioteca del Monasterio de El Escorial, MS T-I-6, folio 27 verso. Image in the Public Domain, Via Wikipedia Commons.

Madrid, Real Biblioteca del Monasterio de El Escorial, MS T-I-6, folio 27 verso. Image in the Public Domain, Via Wikipedia Commons.

Examples of such works include

  • the Book of Games (Libro de acedrez dados e tablas c. 1284) by Alfonso X of Castile, in the Bonus Socius group (13th century?),
  • the Paris manuscript of Le jeu de echecs by Nicola de S. Nicholai (Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France (BNF), MS fr. 1173, 14th century),
  • as well as lesser-known manuscripts, such as Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O 2.45 (after 1248 AD).

The book medium, however, poses serious challenges to scribes concerned with conserving and conveying knowledge related to games and other pastimes, as their existence is ephemeral and their experience difficult to verbalize — which is a reason why in the (Arabic and European) tradition medieval books on games usually came with said pictures and diagrams, with the intent to compensate for what cannot be easily expressed through words alone. What is more, in medieval writings on games their epistemological status often remains ambivalent and uncertain, as they were often touted as morally ambiguous and did not fit existing knowledge systems. That said, there nonetheless were some scholars that tried to fit ludic knowledge into prevalent eschatological framework of knowledge, such as Hugh of Saint-Victor, with some of them basing their (re-)assessments of the morality and epistemic status of games and other forms of entertainment on Arabic and Greek influences.  As reaffirmed by Hugh and in the work of Thomas Aquinas, the Latin concept of ludus could not only serve as an umbrella term for various kinds of games, but all forms of entertainment.

While the focus of the proposed Session is games, the evocation of ludic knowledge is intended as an invitation to different kinds of pastimes in order jointly to examine how medieval scholars dealt with game-related forms of knowledge, from material objects to their metaphysical and anthropological relevance. Especially the latter implies and extends the perspective towards practices employing games and other pastimes methodologically for educational purposes. Consequently, the geographical scope is not restricted to the European sphere. On the contrary, since there is strong evidence that European game manuscripts drew much from Arabic and other non-Latin traditions, contributors focusing on the Byzantine Empire, the Islamic world, India, or other cultural world regions are very much welcome and encouraged to partake.

Some possible questions could be (but are not limited to):

  • What do we know about the authorship of game manuscripts?
  • Are the works written by single individuals or collectives?
  • In what types of miscellanies do writings on games and game manuals appear and why?
  • How do manuscripts/authors deal with ephemeral aspects of games and other pastimes that are difficult to be expressed linguistically?
  • How can we reconstruct the concrete educational practices wherein games and other pastimes were used?
  • What hints thereof can we find in the material evidence of manuscripts?
  • How do authors try to systematize ludic knowledge and where do they position it within given epistemic frameworks?
  • What can we say about the relationship between game diagrams and diagrammatic representations in scientific disciplines in terms of a shared visual vocabulary?

Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.2.45, fols 2v-3r. Image copyright the Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge, via CC-NY 4.0.

Note on the Image

Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O 2.45 (after 1248 AD), folios 2v and 3r. Accompanying the text, diagrams and illustrations depict two chess boards, an alquerque, a nine-mens-morris and a daldøsa game board. The first moves of the game are already played.

Image © the Master and Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge, via License CC BY-NC 4.0 via Trinity College Cambridge.

Proposals

For information about submitting your proposals for our Sessions, please see the CFP for our companion suite for IMC 2025:

  • 2025 International Medieval Congress at Leeds: Call for Papers (Manuscripts as Worlds of Learning)

Deadlines for Proposals

  • 5 September 2024 for your individual paper proposals for our RGME Sessions and Round-table Discussion
  • 30 September 2024 for the RGME to complete and submit its programmes.

To prepare your proposals, see the IMC instructions

  • How to Submit a Proposal

Send your proposals for our Session to us at

  • rgme.imc.sessions@gmail.com by 5 September 2024

When your proposals are accepted, we will direct you to submit them through the

  • IMC-Leeds Confex Submission Portal

Spread the Word

Look for our RGME CFPs on the IMC 2025 website:

  • IMC 2025 Padlet Page

Questions and Suggestions?

If you wish, please:

  • add your Comments here,
  • send us a message (Contact Us),
  • visit our Facebook Page and Facebook Group,
  • join the Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence (there is no charge), and
  • register for our events on our RGME Eventbrite Portal:
    RGME Eventbrite Collection

*****

 

Tags: Alfonso X of Castile, Board Games, Book of Games, Chess, Games in the Middle Ages, History of Board Games, Jeu des echecs, Le jeu de echecs, Ludus astrologicus, Manuscript studies, Quadrivia, Rhythmomachy
No Comments »

Patrick Wormald (1947–2007): A Memoir by David Ganz

August 12, 2024 in Announcements, Bembino, Manuscript Studies, Memoirs, Research Group Episodes for The Research Group Speaks, Research Group Speaks (The Series)

Patrick Wormald (1947–2007):
A Memoir by David Ganz

2024 RGME Anniversary Recollections
Part 2

[Posted on 12 August 2024]

Patrick Wormald at one of Wendy Davies’s charter weekends of the Bucknell group at Bucknell, Shropshire, in the late 1980s. Photograph by Rosemary Morris.

Our series of 2024 Anniversary Reflections continues its tributes for people who have contributed to our formation, progress, and the mission over the years.

Part 1 focused on Giles Constable (1929—2021), RGME Honorary Trustee, Colleague, Friend, and Mentor.

  • Recollections for the 2024 RGME Anniversary, Part 1: Giles Constable

Part 2 turns to our long-term Associate Patrick Wormald (1947–2007), Angl0-Saxon Legal Historian, with a Memoir by our Trustee David Ganz. We offer it as a booklet freely for download.

Anniversary Reflections

In 2024, with our year’s theme of Bridges, the RGME celebrates:

  • 25 years as a nonprofit educational organization incorporated in Princeton, New Jersey, and
  • 35 years as an international scholarly organization founded as part of a major research project on “Anglo-Saxon and Related Manuscripts” at The Parker Library of Corpus Christi College in the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom.

Among the ways to mark our anniversary, the RGME continues with its series of Memoirs (including these Parts 1 and 2 in 2024) and prepares an Episode in our online series “The Research Group Speaks” to consider

  • Episode 17. “RGME Retrospect and Prospects: Anniversary Reflections”

To register:

  • Episode 17. Retrospect and Prospects: Anniversary Reflections
    Saturday 21 September 2024, 1:00–2:30 EDT (GMT-4) online via Zoom

The Episode aims to include recollections of people who have gone before us, and whose memory we wish to honor with informal conversation and a roundtable.

Memoir of Patrick Wormald
Angl0-Saxon Legal Historian

In preparation for the Episode in September 2024, David Ganz has offered this Memoir.

“The Schartz–Metterhulme Method:
A Memoir of Patrick Wormald (1947–2007)”
by David Ganz

David began its composition years ago, following the Memorial Service for Patrick in Oxford.  He returned to it recently for us in preparing for our Episode 17.  Additions for the publication include

  • photographs of Patrick, generously provided by Rosemary Morris;
  • David’s description of Patrick’s attention to and use of manuscript evidence and contributions to some RGME events;
  • bibliographical references; and
  • an Afterword by Mildred Budny.

The title takes its name from a short story with that name by Saki, the pen name of Hector Hugh Munro (1870–1916). First published in 1911, “The Schartz—Metterklume Method” appeared in the volume of Beasts and Super-Beasts (1914).

In conjuring up the world and horizons of historians at Oxford in an earlier generation when Patrick Wormald embarked upon his studies, giving shape to their pursuit across a lifetime at the University of Oxford and elsewhere, the Memoir by David Ganz offers perspectives from a near-contemporary of that life’s work, which continued to engage with various of those historians and their antecedents, not least Frederic William Maitland (1850–1906). The Memoir signals Patrick’s attention repeatedly to the evidence of manuscripts, as part of his research, teaching, and publications. Some of his publications long-planned found fruition posthumously after Patrick’s death too soon at the age of fifty-seven.

We publish this Memoir as an RGME Publication, following the principles of our Style Manifesto, set in our digital font Bembino, and freely available for circulation.  (For information about download or printed copies, see below.)

Patrick Wormald on a charter weekend at Bucknell, Shropshire, in the late 1980s. Photograph by Rosemary Morris.

Read the rest of this entry →

Tags: All Soul's College, Anglo-Saxon legal history, Christ Church University of Oxford, David Ganz, Elizabeth A.R. Brown, Frederic William Maitland, Memoirs, Oxford Historians, Patrick Wormald, Peggy Brown, RGME Anniversary, RGME Colloquia, RGME Seminars on the Evidence of Manuscripts, University of Glasgow, University of Oxford
No Comments »

Medieval Women’s Networks

August 4, 2024 in Announcements, Event Registration, Events, Manuscript Studies, Medieval Women's Networks

“Medieval Women’s Networks:
Exploring Tools and Techniques
for Digital Analysis”

A Pair of Interactive Public Workshops

co-organized by
Kathy Krause and Laura Morreale
and co-sponsored by the RGME

Thursday and Friday 17–18 October 2024 (Online)
12:30–14:30 pm EDT (GMT-4)

[Posted on 5 August 2024, with updates]

We gladly announce another event for our 2024 Anniversary Year.

The RGME has been invited to co-sponsor the free 2-day online event to explore and advance the swiftly developing world of work on Medieval Women’s Networks.

Co-Organizers

The event is conceived and co-organized by experts

  • Kathy Krause (University of Missouri, Kansas City, Emerita)
  • Laura Morreale (Independent Scholar and Middle Ages for Educators)

Laura, our RGME Associate, gave a presentation for our 2024 Anniversary Symposium “Manuscript Heart” in February. This coming event joins a series of collaborative events and projects which she helps to organize, accomplish, and publish.

We are glad to join forces with Kathy and her and all the co-sponsors for Medieval Womens’ Networks.

Co-Sponsors

To be held online, the event is co-sponsored by

  • Center for Digital and Public Humanities, the University of Missouri Kansas City
  • Digital Medievalist
  • the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence
  • and a generous Anonymous Benefactor.

UMKC Center for Digital and Public Humanities Logo

Logo of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence (colour version)

RGME Logo

Digital Medievalist Logo

Dates

The Interactive Public Workshop will take place over two days, in sessions devoted respectively to

1) Projects. Thursday 17 October 2024
2) Data. Friday 18 October 2024

Each session is scheduled for 12:30–2:30 pm EDT (GMT-4) online.

For information see the flyer, shown here, and links below.

“Medieval Women’s Networks” Flyer.

Participants

Speakers and Digital Humanities Experts come from an international variety of centers and perspectives.

Speakers for Workshop 1: Projects

  • Adrienne Williams Boyarin (University of Victoria)
  • Elena Brizio (Georgetown University)
  • Tracy Chapman Hamilton (Sweet Briar College)
  • S.C. Kaplan (University of California, Santa Barbara)
  • Samantha Katz–Seal (University of New Hampshire)
  • Mariah Proctor–Tiffany (University of California, Long Beach)
  • Yvonne Seale (State University of New York, College at Geneseo)

Digital Humanities Experts for Workshop 2: Data

  • Kalani Craig (Indiana University)
  • Erin McCarthy (Saint Lawrence University)
  • Jeffrey Rudberg–Cox (University of Missouri, Kansas City)
  • Sébastien de Valeriola (Université libre de Bruxelles)

Information and Registration

To register please visit the Event registration form via Google Docs, where can also be found online information.

1. Event registration
2. An online information sheet
If Google Workspace is not accessible to you, please contact us. (See below.)
The Event flyer is available for download on the RGME website in two formats:
  • DHWomenFinalFlyer3 (pdf)
  • Medieval Women’s Networks Flyer (jpg)

London, British Museum, Additional MS 10292, fol. 149r. Prose Lancelot-Grail. Saint Omer or Tournai, 1316. Image © The British Library.

We thank the co-organizers and co-sponsors of Medieval Women’s Networks for the opportunity to join the carefully-prepared program for this outstanding event.  We look forward eagerly to it.  We invite you to join it!

*****

Other RGME-sponsored Events
for our 2024 Anniversary Year

  • 2023 and 2024 Events
  • Episode 17. “RGME Retrospect and Prospects: Anniversary Reflections (Saturday 21 September, online)
  • 2024 Autumn Symposium “At The Helm” (Friday and Saturday 25-26 October 2024, online)
  • Episode 18. “Women as Makers of Books” (Saturday 14 December 2024, online)

To register for these sponsored events, please visit the RGME Eventbrite Collection:

  • RGME Eventbrite Registration Portal

An RGME Bulletin Board

Ronda, Galicia, Spain, Puente Nuevo Bridge. Photograph 14 August 2007 by Mark Gilbert. Image: Judas6000 at English Wikipedia, CC BY 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Punte_Nuevo_Bridge,_Ronda_-_Spain.jpg.

The co-sponsorship for Medieval Women’s Networks leads the RGME to open a new page on our website for news about activities, projects, conference papers, publications, and initiatives by people of the RGME.  Functioning as a form of bulletin board with announcements, it appears here:

  • Around and About with the RGME

First up, with an announcement by Laura Morreale, is the Sweet 16 Competition launched by the Princeton-based Middle Ages for Educators (MAFE). The due date for proposals is 1 October 2024.

Questions? Suggestions?

  • Leave your comments or questions below
  • Contact Us

Visit our Social Media:

  • our FaceBook Page
  • our Facebook Group
  • our Twitter Feed (@rgme_mss)
  • our Bluesky nest @rgmesocial.bluesky.social)
  • our LinkedIn Group

Join the Friends of the RGME.

Consider making a Donation in Funds or in Kind for our nonprofit educational corporation powered principally by volunteers. Your donations and contributions are welcome, and can go a long way. They may be tax-deductible to the fullest extent provided by the law.

  • Donations and Contributions
  • 2024 Anniversary Appeal

Remember to register for “Medieval Women’s Networks” for 17–18 October 2024 (see above). See you there!

*****

Tags: Center for Digital and Public Humanities, Digital Medievalist, Interactive Public Workshop, Medieval Women's Networks, RGME Anniversary, RGME Anniversary Year, University of Missouri Kansas City
No Comments »

2025 International Medieval Congress at Leeds: Call for Papers

August 1, 2024 in Announcements, Call for Papers, International Medieval Congress, Leeds, Manuscript Studies

2025 International Medieval Congress
at Leeds:
Call for Papers

“Manuscripts as Worlds of Learning”
(2 Sessions + Roundtable)

32nd Annual IMC
Monday to Thursday 07–10 July 2025
(with In-Person and Virtual Components)

Deadline for your Proposals for Papers: 5 September 2024

Dublin, Royal Irish Academy, MS 23 E 25, p. 73, top. Image via https://codecs.vanhamel.nl/Dublin,_Royal_Irish_Academy,_MS_23_E_25 via Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0).

[Posted on 1 August 2024, with updates]

Building upon the successful completion of our RGME Inaugural Session at the International Medieval Congress (IMC) at the University of Leeds in July 2024, we announce the Call for Papers (CFP) for our activities at next year’s Congress.

For information about the Congress, see

  • its official website,
  • instructions about submitting proposals via their Congress Confex Portal, and
  • the IMC 2025 Call for Papers Padlet page, which shows organised sessions that are advertising for papers, including Twitter/X posts tagging @IMC_Leeds.

Note that the general deadline for individual papers without specified sessions in a general pool is 31 August 2024.

The deadline for proposals for our RGME-sponsored Sessions is 5 September 2024.  Please send your proposals directly to us as organisers; we will select the programmes by their deadline of 30 September 2024.  (Instructions below.)

“Worlds of Learning” at Leeds in 2025

Next year’s Thematic Focus for the IMC is “Worlds of Learning”. The broad scope is described in the general Call for Papers: IMC 2025 – ‘Worlds of Learning’.

We invite you to submit proposals for a set of interlinked events planned for the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence (RGME) to focus on the power and potential of manuscripts to contain, convey, and embody worlds of learning within their span.  In effect, given their structure and contents, as we approach them as beholder, user, reader, student, teacher, or admirer, they may carry worlds in our hands.

How might medieval manuscripts do so, variously for their medieval audience, later intermediaries, and our own times? How might and do they function as “Worlds of Learning” in their own right/write?  We explore.

Update (14 August 2024): As interest grows, we plan several sessions for the 2025 IMC.

In another post, we present a Session with Papers devoted to “Game Knowledge and Knowledge of Games”, which follows up a strand in our RGME Inaugural Session this year.

  • “Knowledge Games and Games of Knowledge”: An RGME Session for IMC 2025

Here we present a suite of events containing two Sessions with Papers accompanied by a Round Table with Discussion, all dedicated to “Manuscripts as Worlds of Learning”.

Read the rest of this entry →

Tags: 'Commonplace Books', Authority Texts, Biblical Commentaries, Classbooks, History of Pedagogy, Instruments of Learning, International Congress on Medieval Studies, International Medieval Congress, Lebor na hUidre (LU), Legal Commentaries, Manuscript Miscellanies, Manuscript studies, Pedagogy, RIA MS 23 E 25, Worlds of Learning
No Comments »

Memoirs

July 23, 2024 in Announcements, Bembino, Manuscript Studies, Memoirs, Research Group Speaks (The Series), RGME Recollections, RGME Symposia, Seminars on Manuscript Evidence

Remembering
Those Who Have Gone Before

[Posted on 22 July 2024]

In our 2025 Anniversary Year, the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence reflects on people who have gone before us and whom we wish to recollect as companions or mentors, advisers, colleagues, and friends contributing to the origins, history, and growth of our organization across the years.

Part of that process has yielded the formation of our own nonprofit educational publishing house.  Our books and booklets in printed form and digital formats include Memoirs, to which we add this year.

1. Oleg Andreevich Grabar

The first of these Memoirs appeared quietly in 2015 as a 4-page booklet.  It offers a Memorial for Oleg Grabar, art historian and archaeologist:

In Memory of
Oleg Andreevich Grabar
[Олег Андреевич Грабар]
(3 November 1929 – 8 January 2011)

Composed by Leonid A. Beliaev, the text was published first in Russian. By request, it was translated from the Russian into English, set in multi-lingual RGME Bembino, provided with a photograph by permission, and laid out as a booklet corresponding with our RGME Style Manifesto.

Although Oleg did not participate in RGME activities, he generously gave advice for our research over several years while our Director worked as a part-time research assistant for his colleague Giles Constable (see below).  The translation and publication of the English version of the Memoir in Russian were carried out for its author, an RGME Associate, at the request and with the assistance of a long-term supporter and advisor of the RGME.  Note that the RGME font Bembino supports the Cyrillic font appropriate for portions of the text of the published Memoir.

The booklet can freely be downloaded:

  • Memorial for Oleg Grabar.

*****

2. Vivien Anne Law

For our blog on Manuscript Studies, in 2014 our Director, Mildred Budny, provided a blogpost called Memorials.  Principally it shares recollections of friend, colleague, and long-time RGME participant (first as Associate of our international scholarly organization in England and then as Trustee of our non-profit corporation), Vivien Anne Law (1954–2002). This forms part of a larger report or Memoir responding, in part, to the opportunity to examine and advise on Vivien’s archives in late 2005 at the request of her widower, Sir Nicholas Shackleton (1937–2006).

Our Director’s paper for our 2002 Colloquium at the British Museum in London in March (a month after Vivien’s death) is dedicated to her memory, as well as that of another, dear, friend and mentor.

  • 2002 Colloquium on “Shaping Understanding: Form and Order in the Anglo-Saxon World (400–1100)”.
Vivien Law in her Garden in Cambridge, England,June 1996 Photograph © Mildred Budny

Vivien Law in her Cambridge Garden in June 1996 (Photograph © Mildred Budny)

*****

3. Giles Constable

Also for our blog Manuscript Studies, this year we posted a set of recollections about of Giles Constable (1 June 1929 — 17 January 2021), friend, colleague, mentor, and RGME Associate and Honorary Trustee.  These recollections do not comprise an obituary as such, because Giles often and firmly expressed his wish for no such thing, nor any Memorial Service or Festschrift for him in his honor.

Instead, after an interval of mourning, we record appreciation for his contributions as a presence and guiding force for our organization since its early years in the United States, following the move of our principal base from the United Kingdom to Princeton, New Jersey, in October of 1994.

  • Recollections for the 2024 RGME Anniversary Year, Part 1. Giles Constable.
Giles Constable reading in his office at the Institute for Advanced Studies. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

Giles Constable reading in his office at the Institute for Advanced Studies. Photograph by Mildred Budny.

Also, his generous encouragement of our work for manuscript studies by long-term loans or gifts made it possible closely to examine, over time, groups of original specimens of medieval manuscripts, manuscript fragments, documents, seals in metal or wax, early printed materials, bindings, and associated records.  The work included conservation, photography, research, seminars, display, and publication in our blog and other forms.

Discoveries abounded, and found expression in those publications as well as in various of our RGME events. For example:

  • 2014 Seminar on Manuscripts and Their Photographs, held at the Index of Christian Art of Princeton University in its Seminar Room.

*****

5. Patrick Wormald

Now, in preparation for our Episode 17. “RGME Retrospect and Prospects: Anniversary Reflections” in September 2024, our RGME Associate and Trustee David Ganz offers a Memoir of our RGME Associate Patrick Wormald (1947–2004).

Coffee Break at the 2002 British Museum Colloquium.

Patrick Wormald at the 2002 Colloquium

*****

In Memoriam

See also RGME Officers, Associates, and Volunteers: In Memoriam.

Another Memoir composed by our Director in booklet format, published in a limited edition:

  • “The Guessing Game:  A Memoir of My Uncle Bob, Robert Roger McEwan (1918‒2007)” (Princeton, New Jersey:  Milly Budny Designs, 2017)

*****

Others?

Are there others whom you wish to remember?  Please let us know.  Would you like to contribute a Memoir of some kind about someone you recall with appreciation and seek to record?

For example, you could Contact Us or write to the director@manuscriptevidence.org with your requests or suggestions.

*****

Episode 17 of “The Research Group Speaks”

As part of our anniversary celebrations, the RGME prepares an Episode in our online series “The Research Group Speaks” to consider our past, present, and future.

  • Episode 17. “RGME Retrospect and Prospects: Anniversary Reflections”

It will, for example, offer recollections of people who have loomed large in our history, and whom we remember with affection, admiration, and gratitude.  Among them are Giles Constable, Vivien Law, and Patrick Wormald (see above).  Please join us.

To register:

  • Episode 17. Retrospect and Prospects: Anniversary Reflections
    Saturday 21 September 2024, 1:00–2:30 EDT (GMT-4) online via Zoom

See you there?

*****

Tags: Giles Constable, Memoirs, Oleg Grabar, Patrick Wormald, Vivien Law
No Comments »

Three-Step Program, Lemonade Included

June 25, 2024 in Announcements, Design, Manuscript Studies, RGME Competition, RGME Recipes

Favorite Recipes for Lemonade

Entries Invited

A Recipe Competition
for the Friends
of the
Research Group on Manuscript Evidence

[Posted on 25 June 2024, with updates]

Los Angeles, The J. Paul Getty Museum, Jacob van Hulsdonck (1582-1647), Still Life with Lemons, Oranges, and a Pomegranate. Image Public Domain.

As we launch the new community of Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence, we consider activities which might be both welcoming and easy to organize, as well as fun.

In considering what sorts of activities the Friends might like, we thought about gatherings for conversations with refreshments.

We began to dream about coffee mornings, tea parties, cocktail parties, receptions, and the like. While our gatherings would be mostly online, some would be in-person or hybrid.  The online format would require that, in such cases, the refreshments would take the form of Bring Your Own (BYO), but we could easily share recipe tips.

Contents of the Goody Bags, with Stories and Baked Goodies created by Linda Civitello. Photograph by Hannah Goeselt.

Already some of our online events have featured recipes, including a demonstration.

  • South Italian Cuisine Before Columbus (Linda Civitello)
  • Episode 15. Women Writers from the Medieval to Postmodern Periods, including cookery books and historic recipes (Linda Civitello and Hannah Goeselt)

Our 2024 Spring Symposium in hybrid format featured a generous Goody Bag created and home-made by our Associate Linda Civitello (see also Linda Civitello), culinary historian and exclusive caterer.

  • 2024 Spring Symposium at Vassar College: Report

This experience, together with our natural interest in food and sharing refreshments with friends in good company, led to the subject of recipes, shared recipes, and refreshments. Plus competitions, with prizes.  And so, we offer a Competition.

A Three-Step Program

We call this Competition a Three-Step Program.  In three steps, it sets out a plan to feature lemons, although other citrus fruits and other comestibles might pertain, to taste.

On the Subject of Lemons

“Native to South Asia, South Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia, Melanesia, and Australia,” the genus Citrus comprises oranges, mandarins, lemons, grapefruits, pomelos, and limes. Used, cultivated, and domesticated by indigenous cultures since ancient times in these tropical and sub-tropical regions, the cultivation spread from there “into Micronesia and Polynesia by the Austronesian expansion (c. 3000–1500 BCE); and to the Middle East and the Mediterranean (c. 1200 BCE) via the incense trade route, and onwards to Europe and the Americas.”

— See Citrus (Wikipedia)

History as Background

The RGME has had some Competitions with Prizes before.  For example, in 2015, with a book as prize, we asked for entries giving the transcription and translation into modern English for two medieval charters.  One award per charter.

Preston Charters, Faces.

Private Collection. “Preston Charters” Faces. Numbers added to the photograph report the present owner’s numbering for the set, from 5 to 7 and 9 to 13. Photograph Mildred Budny.

I was researching a group of medieval charters from a Private Collection, with discoveries about the people, places, place-names, and landscapes which they evoke at specific moments in history regarding particular locations of land in the possession of various individuals and carrying signatures (or marks) of named individuals involved in transactions regarding those lands; some of these documents retain their seals (or remnants of them) or seal-bags.  A series of blogposts ensued.

  • Full Court Preston
  • Preston Charters: The Chierographs
  • Charter the Course: More on Preston Charters

Also:

  • “Seals, Matrices, and Signatories

There came a point when I thought it might be worthwhile to open the field, and I wished for help with transcribing and translating the documents. For prizes, I chose books on medieval land-related subjects, among which the winners could choose.

I opened the competition widely as a blogpost on the RGME website, with images of the charters and instructions.  Submissions were received, an expert committee reviewed them, winners were selected, and awards were given.  The book-awards were selected and sent.  The winning translations+translations were published as a follow-up blogpost:

  • Preston Take 2

The Winner, in this case, Takes All, because one person won both competitions:  William H. Campbell.  Later he expertly organized a pair of Sessions about medieval book-bindings which the RGME co-sponsored with the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies (SIMS) at the University of Pennsylvania for the 2023 International Congress on Medieval Studies. Now he is one of our Honorary Invited Associates. (See our Officers, Associates, and Volunteers.)

Three Steps

1. Maxim: Life Gives You Lemons

2. Action: Make Lemonade (or similar)

3. Result: Send Your Favorite Recipe for our Competition

Extra Bonus: Prize Award

Our competition takes its inspiration from a predicament and its resourceful resolution.  A brief history of the proverbial phrase in English, in several manifestations, covers the ground:

  • When Life Gives You Lemons, Make Lemonade.

The general idea appears to consider lemons, whether metaphorical or tangible, as being sour, therefore difficult, adverse, unfortunate, and so on. The advised response would work to make them palatable or better, by means of some additions and operations.

We could think of it, for our present purposes, as:

  • Challenge, Response, Prize.

Step 1. Find your Lemons

Note that the Competition does not require that the recipe for “Lemonade” have Lemon fruit itself.  Substitutions are allowed, such as other Citrus fruits.  Combinations of fruits (or flowers) are also allowed.

Customarily Lemonade, by virtue of its name, depends upon or implies Lemons as the main ingredient, with sweeteners of various kinds introduced to taste (and according to waistlines). Over the centuries, across cultures, and subject to availability or preference, sweeteners might range from dates or honey to sugar, maple syrup, stevia or other sugar substitutes / artificial sweeteners, and strawberries. These components are prepared in a variety of proportions, according to varieties, such as the sweeter hybrid Meyer Lemon, strictly #notalemon, which comprises a cross between a citrus and a mandarin orange / pomelo hybrid.

Some varieties are carbonated; some are alcoholic. The latter might, say, have bourbon, whiskey, tequila, gin, vodka, or sparkling wine. Straws might make an appearance, as might ice.  Garnishes appear in many variations, such as mint or lemon slices. Presentation, vessels, and accessories for the beverage can range from rough-and-ready, at-hand, or improvised, to elaborate and/or exquisite. It can be served on its own or in the company of foodstuffs, such as cookies or other baked goods.

See also, for example:

  • Limonade (French)
  • Limonata (Italian)
  • Limonade (German)
  • Limonade (drank) (Dutch)
  • Limonada (Spanish)
  • lemonêd (Welsh)
  • Лимонад (Russian)

Elena Chockova, “Lemon – fleur et fruit” (25 November 2007). Image via Wikimedia Commons via CC Elena Chochkova, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Over to You

Please Share Your Recipe

Do you have a favorite, or favorites, among the many varieties of lemonade or ‘lemonade’?

For example, do you favor your mother’s or grandmother’s recipe for Lemonade? Are there companion goodies that you think customarily should go with Lemonade?

Please let us know your favorite recipe. The instructions can be as detailed or general as you wish.

You see, we understand that some people prefer to measure ingredients precisely; others prefer the “Chuck It In” Method.

That is what I used to call my father’s approach to cooking, so it seemed to me as a young observer of his methods rarely to be seen in the kitchen.  Roughly speaking, it looked somewhat like this:

Open the Cupboard / Refrigerator; Grab whatever is there or comes to hand; Chuck It In; Stir / Cook / Bake as Indicated or as Interest / Patience Allows; Dish It Out; Eat.

Despite his devotion to fruit and vegetable juices (all freshly made) in his later years, they never seemed to include Lemonade (although he was strong on fresh orange juice, industrial-grade juicer as producer included), so I must look to other families’ or cultures’ recipes. I’d be glad to learn about yours.

When it comes to judging the entries for our Competition, we would not have a bias ahead of time for precise measurements on the one hand or variable approximations or guesswork on the other, so please describe your recipe in the style to which you (or your source for it) are accustomed.

Do you have a name or title for your recipe?

If you like, please let us know its story. For example, is it handed down the family from one generation to the next (or the one after next), from mother, aunt, or grandmother to children, grandchildren, nieces or nephews, and so on? Did you invent or perfect it? Do you keep it, or did you find it, in some handwritten, typed, printed, or digital form?

Would you like to send pictures of the preparation and/or the product?

Competition for the Best Recipe(s)

Please send your entry for this Competition for the Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence to:

  • Friends of the RGME

Depending upon responses, we might publish the winning recipe, or a selection of recipes, as a first installment of the Friends’ Favorite Recipes.

We would welcome your suggestions for other sorts of recipes for our next Competition.

Prizes

With the official launch of the Group of Friends and this competition in time for our Episode 17 on “RGME Retrospect and Prospects”, we announce the prizes. (All of them are donations for the purpose).

First Prize: Kitchen Apron with lemon pattern and lemon-shaped pockets.
Second Prize: Set of 12 linen cocktail napkins with lemon pattern and yellow border.
Third Prize: 2 packs of 8 dinner-sized paper plates with a lemon-sprig design.

Bonus prize for all: RGME Recipe booklet with our Favorite Recipes (Yours included!)

Mint Lemonade in New York City at a Friends’ Reunion. Photography by Mildred Budny.

*****

Update (6 November 2024):

A new blogpost reports some first entries for this competition, announces an expansion of the terms of the competition (i.e. lemonade and more), and lists more prizes which have been donated to the cause.

  • Favorite Recipes for Lemonade, Etc.

*****

Questions or Suggestions?

Please leave your comments or questions below, Contact Us, or visit

  • our FaceBook Page
  • our Facebook Group
  • our Twitter Feed (@rgme_mss)
  • our Bluesky nest @rgmesocial.bluesky.social)
  • our LinkedIn Group
  • our Blog on Manuscript Studies and its Contents List

Donations and contributions , in funds or in kind, are welcome and easy to give.  Given our low overheads, your donations have direct impact on our work and the furtherance of our mission.  For our Section 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational organization, your donations may be tax-deductible to the fullest extent permitted by law.  Thank you for your support!

  • Contributions and Donations
  • 2024 Anniversary Appeal

We look forward to hearing from you.

*****

Update (22 August 2024)

The first entry has arrived. Simple as can be.

1. Our Layout and Font Designer describes the answer to “Live Gives You Lemons” succinctly:

  • Give Them Back

*****

Do you have a preferred recipe to share with us? We’d love to hear.

Los Angeles, The J. Paul Getty Museum, Jacob van Hulsdonck (1582-1647), Still Life with Lemons, Oranges, and a Pomegranate. Oil on panel, about 1620–1630, within frame. Image Public Domain, via https://useum.org/artwork/Still-Life-with-Lemons-Oranges-and-a-Pomegranate-Jacob-van-Hulsdonck

*****

 

Tags: Favorite Recipes, Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence, Lemonade, Lemons, Recipe Competition, Recipes
No Comments »

To Whom Do Manuscripts Belong?

May 26, 2024 in Manuscript Studies

To Whom Do Manuscripts Belong?

Georgi Parpulov
(independent scholar)

[A Guest Blogpost by our Associate, Georgi Parpulov]

Stray leaf from cod. A 13 of the Lavra on Mount Athos. Recto, detail. Formerly Bath (England), private collection. Present whereabouts uncertain. (Photo: Alexander Saminsky)

A short paper that I published two years ago about dispersed fragments from the library of St Catherine’s Monastery on Mount Sinai prompted a colleague to ask me about ‘manuscripts like these’. ‘What are the ethical issues involved?’, her email went on. ‘Should a collection with fragments from a monastic library offer to return their leaves, for example? Is there any similarity in study of dispersed manuscripts to the study of looted antiquities?’ By way of suggesting possible answers to these questions, I will recount, as accurately and impartially as I can, six distinct series of events.

In March 1917, during World War One, a band of armed men robbed the Greek Eikosiphoinissa Monastery of its library.[1] Because this band was led by the Bulgarian adventurer Todor Panica (1879–1925) and accompanied by the Czech scholar Vladimír Sís (1889–1958), many of the monastery’s manuscripts ended up with public collections in Sofia or Prague. Some, however, remained at first in private hands, and through consecutive sales reached the United States. Two such codices are described, with full provenance information, in a catalogue that Prof. Kenneth Willis Clark (1898–1979) of Duke University published in 1937.[2] In December 2015, ‘the Greek Orthodox Church began sending letters to institutions that possessed the volumes and asked for their return’ (Chicago Tribune of 15 November 2016). The Lutheran School of Theology in Chicago responded by handing over to the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America one of the manuscripts that Clark had catalogued. It was subsequently restituted to Eikosiphoinissa, which nowadays functions as a nunnery. Upon request from the Institut für neutestamentliche Textforschung, a liaison contacted the nuns in 2018 and ascertained the codex’s current shelfmark. High-quality photographs taken in 2010 remain on the website of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts.

On 20 June 1960, the abbot of the Dionysiou Monastery on Mount Athos wrote to the local civil authorities in Karyes that some three months earlier a twelfth-century manuscript had been stolen from his monastery.[3] On Good Friday, namely, about eighty German tourists had arrived at Dionysiou and taken turns, divided into two groups, at visiting its library under the supervision of a senior monk who was not feeling well that day.[4] The codex, the abbot wrote, would have been easy to conceal in the clothing or bag of one of them. Its absence was not immediately marked because it was normally shelved behind the frame of a glazed door.[5] A second letter from the same prelate to the same addressee, bearing date 13/26 June 1961, reported the thereto unnoticed absence of another codex (size 315 × 255 × 120 mm), possibly stolen together with the aforesaid one.[6] Two more codices went missing from the monastery’s library ca. 1960, but the circumstances of their disappearance have never been announced. No steps were taken at the time to identify and arrest the suspected thief or to trace the four stolen items. Detailed descriptions and photographs of one were published in 1979, when in was in private hands,[7] and again in 1987, when it had been purchased by the J. Paul Getty Museum.[8] In January 2014, the 1960 theft report came to the attention of the Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports, which asked the Getty to return the codex to Greece. The museum complied and proceeded to remove all photos of the manuscript from its website. The book remains accessible through a digitized microfilm made in 1953,[9] where all figural miniatures are covered up with cloth.

While the repatriations of 2016 and 2014 were widely reported, a slightly earlier and somewhat similar case remains, to my knowledge, completely unpublicized. In 2012, an Orthodox Christian in England presented to his local church an illuminated leaf from a Byzantine manuscript, expecting the parish priest to sell it. Once a colleague of mine had emailed me two photographs, it did not take long to identify the manuscript from which the leaf had been detached. Even without information about the date and circumstances of this removal, the priest was determined to do the right thing: he contacted the Greek embassy in London and handed the leaf to their cultural attaché. Presumably it has been reunited with its parent-volume on Mount Athos, but no public announcements to that effect were ever made.

Stray leaf from Cod. A 13 of the Monastery of the Lavra on Mount Athos. Greek New Testament with Psalter and Nine Odes, 11th century: Verso with LXX Psalm 77: 4-23 (Psalm 78: 4-23 in the English Bible). Formerly Bath (England), private collection. Present whereabouts uncertain. (Photo: Alexander Saminsky).

Those smooth restitutions can be contrasted with the recent history of the ‘Archimedes Palimpsest’.[10] From at least 1846 till ca. 1920, the now-famous codex belonged to a metochion (dependency) of the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem. It then somehow passed into private hands and was sold at auction to its current owner, an American, in October 1998. A year later the Patriarchate sued for its return. The case was brought before the court of the Southern District of New York and dismissed. ‘Before it filed this lawsuit, the Patriarchate had never asserted claims over other Metochion manuscripts in private hands or announced the disappearance, loss, or theft of any Metochion manuscripts…. In sum, the Patriarchate waited almost seventy years after the Palimpsest was transferred to Mr. Sirieix to bring suit against his heirs [who sold the manuscript in 1998]. The passage of time renders trial of this matter virtually impossible; the Court would be confronted with the Patriarchate’s claim that it clearly possessed the Palimpsest at the beginning of this century against defendants’ claim that they clearly possess it at the end, with little or no evidence of what happened in between.’[11] Since 1999, the palimpsest’s owner has invested generously in its conservation treatment and study. A full set of high-quality digital images has been available for some fifteen years under a Creative Commons license.

My last two stories involve other codices kept in the United States. First we go to Florida. Before The Holy Land Experience, a biblical theme park, closed down in March 2020, all Greek manuscripts of the Van Kampen Collection were housed there. A few of them were on view inside a building called the Scriptorium. When I travelled to Orlando in order to study one that interested me, it was not taken out of its glass case, so I could only see two facing pages. To my joy, the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts had that same book fully photographed in 2008 and made its photographs viewable on the CSNTM website. They remained online till 2020, when a formal letter from a representative of the Van Kampens asked for their removal.

We finally come to Pennsylvania. The library of Bryn Mawr College houses a Greek Psalter from the second half of the twelfth century, Gordan MS 9. It was first offered for sale in 1906 by Karl Wilhelm Hiersemann, whose catalogue description Vladimir Beneševič reprinted in 1911. Its last known owners are the scholar Phyllis Goodhart Gordan (1913–1994) and her spouse John Dozier Gordon Jr. (1907–1968). They had four children. I examined the codex first-hand in 2003, and more recently, on 4 January 2021, wrote to the college’s Curator for Rare Books and Manuscripts to request digital images of it. I was promptly informed that ‘the manuscript in question does not belong to the library, but is on deposit here. We are not able to provide imaging except with the permission of the owner. . . . I will ask our institutional contact with the owner to forward the request. I am not able to guess whether the owner will agree or refuse – or agree with restrictions.’ I am happy to report that I did obtain photographs, in March 2023. I am prohibited from sharing any of them.

By way of conclusion, I must add to the dry facts some general reflections ‘about the state of the field’. Needless to say, from this point on I can only speak for myself. I am not a tenured academic, so I do not absolutely have to study manuscripts for a living. Even so, I am a scholar of sorts, the kind of scholar who is interested in books as objects (rather than just in the texts that they transmit): I want to examine the handwriting, the decoration, the physical structure of a volume. And there has never been a better time than now to study codices from this angle. Various institutions have placed millions of digital images online. Many a library will permit readers to photograph a manuscript they are studying. Collectors want to have their possessions accessed and catalogued.

Thinking of this, I just do not see how property law can be applied to manuscripts without due reflection. The owner of any physical object has the legal right to limit other persons’ access to it: a monastery’s abbot and librarian are not obliged to let me see a book in their custody, photographs once publicly visible may be hidden from view, and so on. Some codices happen to be very expensive: the Archimedes Palimpsest once fetched over $2,000,000 at auction and would almost certainly fetch more nowadays. But these are not just ordinary valuables, they are significant remnants from our common past. Why should a manuscript restituted become a manuscript hidden? Monks or nuns who have managed to reclaim the nineteenth-century content of their libraries ought to remember the gospel: ‘no one after lighting a lamp covers it with a jar or puts it under a bed’. It is bizarre that things as simple as the shelfmark or even the current whereabouts of a leaf sent back to Greece cannot be easily ascertained. It is equally weird to see American owners struggle to keep their manuscripts out of sight for fear of possible restitution claims.

On 23 June 1964, Pope Paul VI told his college of cardinals: ‘Accepting the request of Constantine, Orthodox Metropolitan of Patras, St Peter’s Basilica will return to his see a priceless relic: that of the sacred head of St Andrew the Apostle. This precious relic was entrusted to Our predecessor Pope Pius II, the famous Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini, who received it under peculiar historical circumstances on 12 April 1462 in order that it be worthily kept next to the tomb of Andrew’s brother the Apostle Peter with the intention that it might one day, God willing, be sent back.’ The head was duly returned to Greece three months later. Countless Christians ceaselessly venerate it, and if I ever visit Patras, I shall not be stopped from doing the same. So should a collection with fragments from a monastic library offer to return their leaves? I might as well directly address the possessors or custodians of such relics: If you believe that manuscripts fall in the same class of objects as human remains, then yes, go ahead and return them to those whom you deem to be their rightful heirs. Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.

————————————

[1] An eyewitness account by the monastery’s abbot Neophytus is printed in K. E. Tsiakas, Ἱστορία τῆς Ἱερᾶς Μονῆς Εἰκοσιφοινίσσης Παγγαίου (Drama 1958) 40–41.

 [2] K. W. Clark, A Descriptive Catalogue of Greek New Testament Manuscripts in America (Chicago 1937) 51–53, 104–106.

[3] Διὰ τοῦ παρόντος καὶ μετὰ πολλῆς τῆς λύπης μας ἀναφέρομεν Ὑμῖν, ὅτι ἐκ τῆς Βιβλιοθήκης τῆς Μονῆς μας ἐκλάπη πρὸ τριμήνου περίπου, ὡς συμπεραίνομεν, ὁ ὑπ᾽ ἀριθ. 8 περγαμηνὸς χειρόγραφος Κώδιξ (sic) τοῦ 12ου αἰῶνος . . .

[4] Τὴν Μ. Πέμπτην προσήγγισεν εἰς τὴν Μονήν μας τὸ ἀτμόπλοιον “ΑΔΡΙΑΤΙΚΗ” μὲ Γερμανοὺς περιηγητάς, ἐξ ὧν περὶ τοὺς 80 ἀνῆλθον εἰς τὴν Μονήν. Περὶ τῆς ἐλεύσεώς των εἶχομεν προειδοποιηθῆ ἐκ Καριῶν καὶ Δάφνης καὶ ἐπειδὴ ἦλθον περὶ ὥραν 12ην μεσημβρινήν, ὅτε ἐτελεῖτο ἡ θεία λειτουργία, ἐπεσκέφτησαν μόνον τὴν Τράπεζαν τοῦ φαγητοῦ καὶ τὴν Βιβλιοθήκην εἰς δύο ὁμάδας, λόγω στενότητος χώρου. Κατὰ τὴν ἐπίσκεψίν των εἰς τὴν Βιβλιοθήκην περιευρίσκετο καὶ ὁ Ἐπίτροπος Γ. Θεόκλητος, καίτοι ἀσθενής, πρὸς ἀσφάλειαν. Διστυχῶς ἡ εἴσοδος 40 περίπου ἀτόμων εἰς τὸν περιωρισμένον χῶρον τῆς Βιβλιοθήκης καὶ ὁ ὡς ἐκ τούτου συνωστισμὸς διηυκόλησε τοὺς κλέπτας . . .

[5] Ὁ Κῶδιξ εἶναι 30 πόντων ὕφους, 20 πλάτους καὶ 4–5 πάχους καὶ ὡς ἐκ τούτου εὐκόλως ἀπεκρύβη εἰς τὸν κόλπον ἢ τὴν τσάνταν τοῦ κλέψαντος. Ἡ θέσις του ἦτο εἰς τὸ ἄκρον τῆς θυρίδος καὶ σχεδὸν ἐκαλύπτετο ἀπὸ τὸ σανίμα (sic) αὐτῆς, ἐξ οὗ καὶ δὲν ὑπέπεσεν ἐγκαίρως εἰς τὴν ἀντίληψιν τοῦ Βιβλιοθηκαρίου ἡ ἀπουσία του.

[6] Ἀπαντῶντες εἰς Ὑμέτερον ἔγγραφον ἀπὸ 10.7.61 καὶ ὑπ᾽ ἀριθ. 1222.Γ´, ἔχομεν τὴν τιμὴν νὰ ληροφορήσωμεν Ὑμᾶς, ὅτι ὁ ἐν αὐτῷ ἀναφερόμενος περγαμηνὸς Κῶδιξ τῆς Βιβλιοθήκης μας ὑπ᾽ ἀριθ. 49, . . . ἔχει ἐξαφανισθεῖ ἐκ τῆς Βιβλιοθήκης μας, καὶ ἡ ἐξαφάνισίς του ἐγένετο ἀντιληπτὴ ἀπὸ ἔτους. Τὸν χρόνον τῆς ἐξαφανίσεώς του δὲν δυνάμεθα νὰ προσδιορίσωμεν. Ὑποθέτομεν ὅμως, ὅτι δὲν ἀπέχει τῆς διετίας καὶ ἴσως νὰ ἐκλάπη συγχρόνως μὲ τὸν ἄλλον, τὸν ὑπ᾽ ἀριθ. 54, περὶ τοῦ ὁποίου Σᾶς ἀνεφέρομεν τότε ἀμέσως.

[7] A. von Euw, J. M. Plotzek, Die Handschriften der Sammlung Ludwig, I (Cologne 1979) 159–163 with figs 56–63.

[8] R. S. Nelson, ‘Theoktistos and Associates in Twelfth-Century Constantinople: An Illustrated New Testament of A.D. 1133’, The J. Paul Getty Museum Journal 15 (1987) 53–78.

[9] E. W. Sanders, ‘Operation Microfilm at Mt. Athos’, Biblical Archaeologist 18 (1955) 21–41, at 22 and 30.

[10] K. J. Carver, ‘The Legal Implications and Mysteries Surrounding the Archimedes Palimpsest’, American Journal of Legal History 47 (2005) 119–160.

[11] The Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem vs. Christie’s Inc., No. 98 Civ. 7664 (KMW), 1999 WL 673347 (S.D.N.Y. 30 August 1999).

*****

 

Tags: Access to Manuscripts, Archimedes Palimpsest, Cod. A 13 of the Lavra on Mount Athos, Dionysiou Monastery Mont Athos, Eikosiphoinissa Monastery, History of Collections, Manuscript studies, Manuscript Thefts, Metochion manuscripts, Relic of Saint Andrew the Apostle, Saint Catherine's Monastery, Van Kampen Collection
No Comments »

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »
  • Top
©2024 Research Group on Manuscript Evidence.


is proudly powered by WordPress. WordPress Themes X2 developed by ThemeKraft.