![\""The](\"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/ShelfMarks-1-on-31-Oct-2014-done-Bouquet-List-Heading.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nThe first in a series of reviews by Mildred Budny<\/strong><\/p>\n This review celebrates research by and partly by Trustees and Associates of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence (RGME) by showcasing some recent publications in print and online. \u00a0The title alludes to the widespread medieval genre of florilegia<\/strong><\/em> (\u201cgatherings of flowers\u201d), which collect selected extracts of texts from a larger body or bodies of work. Such compilations, also called \u201cCommonplace Books\u201d or \u201cMiscellanies\u201d \u2014 whether deliberate, haphazard, or serendipitous in their assembly \u2014 have figured in various RGME workshops and publications, and continue to offer challenges for examination.\u00a0\u00a0The title also takes inspiration from the term bouquet<\/strong><\/em> in mathematics, wherein, according to some definitions, a \u201crose\u201d, also known as a \u201cbouquet of n<\/strong><\/em> circles\u201d, yields a \u201ctopological space\u201d by \u201cgluing\u201d together a collection of circles (which might take various shapes such as loops) along a single point (Bouquet of circles<\/strong><\/a>). \u00a0The mathematical term ‘Rose’ is defined at\u00a0Wolfram MathWorld<\/a>. Figural examples appear here: \u00a0Bouquet of n circles via Tikz<\/a>.<\/p>\n First I salute the most recent publications in the long series issuing from conferences held by the Index of Christian Art at Princeton University. \u00a0This University, through its Departments and Programs, including the Department of Art and Archaeology, the Index, and the Program in Medieval Studies, has been the most frequent host and co-sponsor for symposia of the RGME since our arrival in Princeton in 1994. \u00a0The publications are edited by our Honorary Trustee Colum Hourihane, with contributions by some of our Trustees, Officers, and Associates.\u00a0 They are:<\/p>\n The fourteen papers in the Patronage<\/strong> volume consider diverse materials, regions, dynamics of creation\/commission, patterns of patronage, and issues of interpretation. \u00a0Cases poised upon textual evidence \u2014 occurring in manuscript, documentary, and monumental forms \u2014 are plentiful. \u00a0They include Elizabeth Carson Pastan\u2019s nuanced assessment of \u201cThe Bayeux Embroidery [not a Tapestry!<\/em>] & Its Interpretative History\u201d particularly within the sphere of its original creators and audience; Nigel Morgan\u2019s reading of \u201cPatrons & Their Scrolls in Fifteenth-Century English Art\u201d through text- or speech-scrolls in manuscripts, stained glass windows, and monumental brasses; Lucy Freeman Sandler\u2019s sensitive assessment of \u201cThe Bohun Women & Manuscript Patronage in Fourteenth-Century England\u201d, as revealed through the stages of \u201ccommissioning, conceiving, executing, receiving, and bequeathing\u201d, and our Trustee Adelaide Bennett\u2019s reconsideration of \u201cIssues of Female Patronage: French Books of Hours, 1220\u20131320\u201d, with an instructive analysis of the traces of women\u2019s reading habits and instruction. \u00a0The ensemble offers a series of explorations into both charted and hitherto uncharted waters in the vast ocean of medieval materials which came into being through the aid, impediments, guidance, inspiration, and vision of patronage in many forms.<\/p>\n Among the multiple worthy subjects considered in the two e-volumes of The Digital World of Art History<\/strong> (with twenty-two papers), several are firmly central to RGME research activities. \u00a0For example, jointly Maria Oldal, Elizabeth O\u2019Keefe, and William Voelkle (Volume I, chapter 4 = I.4<\/em>) present a guide to the Corsair<\/strong><\/a> database of the Pierpont Morgan Library, which freely provides \u201cunified access to over 250,000 records for medieval and Renaissance manuscripts, rare and reference books, literary and historical manuscripts, music scores, ancient seals and tablets, drawings, prints, and other art objects\u201d. \u00a0Gretchen Wagner offers a trenchant survey of the challenges and possible solutions facing the issues of \u201cCopyright and Scholarship in the Arts\u201d (I.5) in a fast-changing world. \u00a0In \u201cThe \u2018Art\u2019 of Digital Art History\u201d (II.7), focusing upon her experiences in assembling a major report on Transitioning to a Digital World<\/a> for the Kress Foundation, Diane Zorich reflects as a consultant on the nature and potential of digital strategies and issues involving cultural heritage in cultural and educational institutions, principally major museums. \u00a0Members of the Staff of the Index of Christian Art \u2013 Judith Golden, Jessica Savage, our Associate Henry Schilb, Beatrice Raddan Keefe, and Jon Niola \u2013 contribute reports (in I.10\u201314) of its iconographic and bibliographic work, its collaborative projects accomplished or in preparation, and its other resources.<\/p>\n Kandice Rawlings (II.4) describes the varied history and development of the Oxford Art Online<\/a> <\/strong>encyclopedia \u2014 available through subscription \u2014 about anything and everything connected with art, also said to provide \u201caccess to the most authoritative, inclusive, and easily searchable online art resources available today\u201d. \u00a0As a contributor to the original printed form, that is, the Grove Dictionary of Art<\/strong> (1996), I find the story of this enterprise instructive as a vigorous case of transfer from an earlier age of publication, in book form, to the present internet industry of cumulative and composite forces able and willing to overtake, update, expand, and gain, while offering valuable research resources to privileged subscribers.<\/p>\n Anglo-Saxon double-sided seal-matrix of the thegn Godwin (front) and the nun Godgytha (back), made of walrus-ivory in the first half of the 11th century C.E. \u00a0The front of the handle depicts the Trinity resting upon a prone human figure. \u00a0The coin-like roundels on obverse and reverse depict the part-length male and female figures identified by Latin inscriptions, ready for sealing wax. \u00a0Photographs \u00a9 Genevra Kornbluth, reproduced by permission.\u00a0 A detail appears here<\/strong><\/a>, with more information here<\/strong><\/a>. \u00a0Original: London, British Museum, M&ME 1881,4-4,1.<\/p><\/div>\n The report by our Associate Genevra Kornbluth on “Kornbluth Photography: From Private Research to Private Archive\u201d<\/a> (II.4) describes the creation, many years in the making, of her expert photographic archive, now available, with honorable copyright conditions, on her website<\/a>. \u00a0Its \u201cHistorical Archive\u201d gathers images of objects or monuments arranged by multiple indexes (culture\/period, chronology, iconography, medium, object type, location, and artist), including text-based works such as manuscripts, charters, seals and matrices, relic labels, book covers, and inscriptions.<\/p>\n I first met Genevra years ago, when she was conducting research for her Ph.D. dissertation, published as Engraved Gems of the Carolingian Empire<\/strong> (Penn State University Press, 1995, ISBN 978-0-271-01426-5<\/a>), and I have followed the progress of her work with care, so that I have long been aware of the beauty of her detailed photographs of carved rock-crystal gemstones and many other objects of complexity. \u00a0Like her, I have devoted much time to photographing original source materials \u2014 in my case mostly manuscripts and other written works \u2014 not only for my own study, but also for that of others, already in the age before digital methods paved the way for widespread access, now at least on screen and often in high-definition.<\/p>\n As a practitioner, I can attest that the active photographic process (not only as product) of close study of the works themselves \u2013 including manuscripts and other written works \u2013 might reveal features otherwise unsuspected. \u00a0For the gems, the microscopic traces of carving methods, with tools of distinctly differing points, allowed Genevra to distinguish between Byzantine and Carolingian works, in a valuable contribution to knowledge of their identifying characteristics, with photographs recording the features for all to see. \u00a0While Genevra\u2019s contribution to the Index volume freely provides a sampling of her photographs we may illustrate other examples from her website here, generously with her permission. \u00a0Thus it can be possible to look through, as it were, the eyes of the expert examining the sources directly and closely.<\/p>\n Rock crystal (quartz stone) intaglio, mid-to-late 9th century, seen from the smooth front and the engraved, incised back of the stone. \u00a0The upright, cross-bearing \u201cSt. Paul the Apostle\u201d, is identified by Latin inscription. \u00a0Photographs \u00a9 Genevra Kornbluth, reproduced by permission. \u00a0An oblique view appears here<\/strong><\/a>. \u00a0Original: Paris, Biblioth\u00e8que Nationale de France, Cabinet des M\u00e9dailles, H3416.<\/p><\/div>\n Now, to the bouquet I respectfully add the final publications by our RGME Associate Malcolm B.\u00a0Parkes, who died in 2013 at the age of eighty-three. \u00a0A memorial by our Trustee David Ganz appears here:\u00a0 Malcolm B. Parkes., Palaeographer (1930\u20122013<\/a>. \u00a0A collection of Malcolm\u2019s essays in 2012 (complementing an earlier collection in 1991) has now followed the printed version in 2008 of his Lyell Lectures.<\/p>\n These works record and preserve multiple fundamental, often ground-breaking, insights into the nature of scripts in relation to the process of writing, the minds at work, and the voices of the languages, authors, and speakers which the scripts transmit. \u00a0The plates offer examples for study and instruction. \u00a0We are grateful for their presence, while we lament the passing of their author, a kind friend and teacher.<\/p>\n This requirement calls forth the wistful reflection that some florilegia transmitted from the past may represent cherished recollections of previous living voices and vivid moments of instruction \u2014 of which only parts of the originally full representations may yet endure, both in memory and in \u201cprint\u201d. \u00a0We treasure these traces.<\/p>\n For the next issues of the Newsletter, the RGME invites suggestions and donations for books to review.\u00a0\u00a0While this first \u201cBouquet\u201d centers upon publications by, or with contributions by, contributors to the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence, we welcome works by others too.<\/p>\n Genoels\u2013Elderen openwork ivory diptych made circa 800 C.E. \u2014 perhaps formerly the paired covers for a sacred book or a writing tablet.\u00a0 Framed within geometric and interlace borders and accompanied by Latin inscriptions, the cross-bearing Christ, flanked by angels, stands upon the Beasts (with Bird in the form of Rooster), while His mother Mary experiences both the Annunciation with Gabriel and the Visitation with Elizabeth, all with attendants. \u00a0 Photograph \u00a9 Genevra Kornbluth, reproduced by permission. \u00a0 More views and details here: Genoels Elderen<\/strong><\/a>. \u00a0 Original: Brussels, Mus\u00e9es royaux d\u2019Art et d\u2019Histoire, Mus\u00e9e du Cinquantenaire, no. 1474.<\/p><\/div>\n *****<\/p>\n This review forms part of the first issue of the Research Group Newsletter, ShelfMarks<\/strong><\/a>.<\/a>The group of flowering works selected here represent a sampling of our collective and individual interests, which converge and overlap to various extents.<\/p>\n\n
\n[originally [I] (July 12th, 2012)<\/a>, now here<\/a>] (July 12th, 2012) and
\n[originally II: Theory and Practice<\/a>, now here<\/a>] (June 26th, 2013).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/a><\/a>\n
<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n
\nAn e-version of this issue, with ShelfTags<\/strong> for ShelfMarks<\/strong> and some extra images, appears here<\/strong><\/a>.
\nThe full issue appears here:\u00a0ShelfMarks, Volume 1, Number 1\u00a0(PDF)<\/strong><\/a>.
\nYou might Subscribe<\/strong><\/a> here.<\/em><\/p>\n