{"id":13267,"date":"2020-05-07T16:41:07","date_gmt":"2020-05-07T16:41:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/?p=13267"},"modified":"2020-10-26T01:54:35","modified_gmt":"2020-10-26T01:54:35","slug":"simurgh-and-zal-from-a-persian-shahnameh","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/simurgh-and-zal-from-a-persian-shahnameh\/","title":{"rendered":"Simurgh and Zal from a Persian “Shahnameh”"},"content":{"rendered":"

Simurgh and Zaal
\nfrom a Persian Shahnameh<\/em><\/h2>\n

[Posted on 7 May 2020<\/em>]<\/p>\n

\"Private<\/p>\n

Continuing to examine manuscripts or manuscript fragments and related materials in our blog, we turn to an illustrated paper leaf, now in a private collection, from a Persian Shahnameh<\/a> or\u00a0\u0160\u0100H-N\u0100MA (“Book of Kings”).<\/p>\n

The Contents List<\/a> for our blog shows the range of our explorations.\u00a0 Our Galleries of Scripts on Parade<\/a> include specimens of script in Persian as well as other languages, Western and non-Western.<\/p>\n

The Paper Leaf<\/h3>\n

The leaf was purchased in the Portabello Road in London circa 1985.\u00a0 The paper is typical of Persian paper from at least the fifteenth through the nineteenth centuries CE. One side has text, and the other has both text and inset illustration. The ensemble probably dates from the 19th century, with acquired damage of various kinds, including unevenly trimmed edges.<\/p>\n

\"Private

Private Collection, Leaf from a Persian Shanameh. Simurgh and Zal.<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/h3>\n

<\/p>\n

The Shahnameh<\/em><\/h3>\n

This long epic poem, which the Persian poet\u00a0Abul-Q\u00e2sem Ferdowsi Tusi or Ferdowsi<\/a> (circa 329 \u2013 411 AH \/ 940 \u2013 1010 CE) began to compose circa 977 and completed on 8 March 1010 CE, forms a major work of world literature.\u00a0 It recounts in more than 50,000 couplets the history of the kings and heroes of Persia from mythical times to the overthrow of the Sassanids<\/a> by the Arabs in the middle of the 7th century.<\/p>\n

Several episodes describe encounters between the benevolent mythical, phoenix-like creature Simurgh<\/a>\u00a0and Z\u0101l<\/a> or Zaal, the legendary prince who, born with white hair, grew into a heroic warrior king.\u00a0 This illustration shows the gigantic creature with the man in adulthood.<\/p>\n

This creature had rescued him as an infant when his parents, in fear of his albino appearance, had abandoned him on the mountain Alborz<\/a><\/i>, where Simurgh dwelled.\u00a0 She raised him as her own and taught him wisdom.\u00a0 After Z\u0101l’s return to his kingdom and the world of mankind, he summoned Simurgh’s expertise for aid when his wife Rudaba<\/a> was undergoing prolonged labor in childbirth \u2014 leading to the birth of the great hero Rostam<\/a>.\u00a0 That aid took the form of instructing Z\u0101l how to perform a caesarean section.<\/p>\n

Illustrations in Manuscripts<\/h3>\n

The long tradition of illustrations<\/a> for the Shahnameh<\/em> or \u0160\u0101h-n\u0101ma <\/em>is richly varied, in books and other visual arts, and in Persian and other spheres. We learn that the documented history of its illustration in manuscripts<\/a> begins circa 1300 “in the Il-khanid<\/a> period (1256\u20131353), coinciding with the start of the canonical history of Persian painting”.\u00a0 There developed varied approaches to the choices of episodes illustrated, the positioning of the illustrations upon the leaves and at regular or irregular intervals through the course of the volumes, the manner of depicting a given episode, and artistic license.\u00a0 In sum, “there was no prescribed manner for depicting the same episode”, and “there was no fixed set of \u0160\u0101h-n\u0101ma<\/em> illustrations”.\u00a0 From these rich origins developed the unfolding traditions of manuscript illustration for this text in later dynasties and regions, Persian and other.<\/p>\n

Among the very most magnificent representatives of the tradition is the now-dismembered and dispersed Shahnamen of Shah Tahmasp<\/a>, made at Tabriz by many artists circa 1525\u20131530 CE and completed for Shah Tahmasp<\/a> (1514\u20131576).\u00a0 That manuscript, preserved in multiple collections, probably originally comprised two volumes with some 280 large folios and 190 illustrations.\u00a0 Some collections exhibit online a range of its illustrations, as with the 10 folios in the Houghton Shahnameh<\/a> and some of the 78 illustrated pages at the Metropolitan Museum of Art<\/a>.<\/p>\n

That the manuscript tradition could continue to flourish into the 19th century (and beyond) is demonstrated by the copy at the Morgan Library & Museum<\/a>, as MS H. 9<\/a>, made probably in Shi\u0304ra\u0304z, Iran, between 1852 and 1856.<\/p>\n

Perhaps needless to say, at various times in the widespread transmission of the text of the Shahnameh<\/em> and its illustrated versions, non-royal patronage and commercial production also flourished, up to and beyond the history of printing.\u00a0 Given the history of collecting, it seems inevitable that specimens of any standard of quality or otherwise might find their way to fragmented and widely dispersed states of existence or survival.\u00a0 As such, the leaf presented here stands in a very large but vastly separated crowd.<\/p>\n

Simurgh and Z\u0101l<\/h3>\n

The fabulous story of Simurgh and Z\u0101l offers ample scope for vivid depictions.\u00a0 Many expert examples reside in major collections, as with this case at the Metropolitan Museum in New York of circa 1300\u20131330 CE, aattributed to Northwestern Iran or Baghdad (MMA Rogers Fund 1969, 69.74.1).<\/p>\n

\"New

New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Folio from a Shahnama, circa 1300\u201330 CE. “Zal is Restored to his Father Sam by the Simurgh”. Image Public Domain.<\/p><\/div>\n

Or this elaborate version from the famous Tahmasp (or \u1e6cahm\u0101sp) Shahnamah <\/i>(see above) at the Freer Gallery<\/a> in Washington D. C., in which a passing caravan sights Zal with Simurgh as she brings food for him and her nesting chicks.<\/p>\n

\"Washington,

Washington, D. C., Freer Gallery of Art, Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, LTS1995.2.46: Tahmasp Shahnamah, folio 62v. Iran, Tabriz, circa 1525 CE. “Zal is Sighted by a Caravan as Simurgh Feeds Her Chicks”. Image Public Domain.<\/p><\/div>\n

The Illustration on Its Page<\/h3>\n

On the page of “our” leaf, the illustration stands within the text. The fully painted illustration contrasts with the open background of the script, written in black ink with rubrication in red pigment and set out in 4 columns, with 2 to a couplet and 12 lines of text altogether.\u00a0 The heading in red occupies the space of 2 couplets at the center of line 7.\u00a0 Above the illustration stand 10 lines of text, in which the last line spreads to either side of the stepped riser of the illustrated frame, yielding only the 2 outer columns.\u00a0 Below it stand 2 more lines, of which the first similarly spreads around the stepped descender of the frame.<\/p>\n

Both the lines of text and the illustration are partly enclosed by an open-topped framework of ink outlines, which form single (or retraced) vertical bounding lines at both sides and a horizontal line at the bottom.\u00a0 Inset within that frame, the painted illustration stands within its own outlined stepped frame which has block-like risers at top and bottom.<\/p>\n

\"Private

Private Collection, Leaf from a Persian Shanameh. Simurgh and Zal.<\/p><\/div>\n

Z\u0101l’s name figures in the rubric, and his identifying white hair appears to emerge, like an ear-flap, below his helmet.\u00a0 Simurgh assumes a recognizable but perhaps non-standard form, with huge size, spread wings, long tail dividing into streamer-like tips, and red rooster-like crest.<\/p>\n

In the illustration, the pair of figures, man and avian, appear against a painted landscape.\u00a0 Descending from the sky, the creature swoops down from the right to nip or clamp the waistband or sash of the fleeing warrior king, whose outstretched right hand reaches beyond the frame partway into its interspace.\u00a0 With helmet and mustache, the man wears boots, trousers, and a knee-length tunic which partly exposes his white undergarment.<\/p>\n

\"Private

Private Collection, Leaf from a Persian Shanameh. Simurgh and Zal.<\/p><\/div>\n

Mostly, the recounted relationship between the creature and her adopted Z\u0101l appears benign, but here she grabs him \u2014 with both of them poised in mid-flight.<\/p>\n

\"Private

Private Collection, Leaf from a Persian Shanameh. Simurgh and Zal.<\/p><\/div>\n

*****<\/p>\n

Detached from its former manuscript, for now this illustrated leaf must stand for the original whole.\u00a0 Do you know of other leaves from this book and by the same scribe and artist?<\/p>\n

Please leave your comments here or Contact Us<\/a>.\u00a0 Watch this space and the Contents List<\/a> for more discoveries in our blog.<\/p>\n

*****<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Simurgh and Zaal from a Persian Shahnameh [Posted on 7 May 2020] Continuing to examine manuscripts or manuscript fragments and related materials in our blog, we turn to an illustrated paper leaf, now in a private collection, from a Persian Shahnameh or\u00a0\u0160\u0100H-N\u0100MA (“Book of Kings”). The Contents List for our blog shows the range of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":13270,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[678,1],"tags":[1759,1758,1160,462,1760,1753,1754,1756,1757,1755],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13267"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13267"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13267\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14447,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13267\/revisions\/14447"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13270"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13267"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13267"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13267"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}