{"id":11309,"date":"2018-08-30T17:22:48","date_gmt":"2018-08-30T17:22:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/?p=11309"},"modified":"2020-03-25T11:51:19","modified_gmt":"2020-03-25T11:51:19","slug":"consuming-cultures-and-manuscript-evidence-2018b","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/consuming-cultures-and-manuscript-evidence-2018b\/","title":{"rendered":"“Consuming Cultures & Manuscript Evidence” – 2018"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cConsuming Cultures and Manuscript Evidence\u201d<\/h2>\n

2018 Permanent Panel
\nsponsored by the
\nResearch Group on Manuscript Evidence
\nat the
\nMidwest Modern Language Association (M-MLA)<\/h3>\n

2018 Convention
\nKansas City, Missouri
\nNovember 15\u201318, 2018<\/h4>\n

[Posted on 30 August 2018, with updates, now with a change to the Program.\u00a0 Now see a newer version of this post: 2018 M-MLA Panel<\/a>.<\/em>]<\/p>\n

The Research Group on Manuscript Evidence, in keeping with the M-MLA’s theme of \u201cConsuming Cultures\u201d for its 2018 Convention, sponsors a panel on the “Consumption of Manuscripts”.\u00a0 After the completion of the Call for Papers<\/a>, we now announce the Program for the Panel, which will take place on 15 November. The Program for the Convention in full is now available in preview through the M-MLA website<\/a>: 2018 Program Booklet<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Food for Thought<\/h3>\n

In our design for the Panel, both in its proposal (as circulated in the Call for Papers) and in the selected design for its Program, we recognize that consideration of “consumption” can be literal, metaphorical, or both.\u00a0 For example, the process and product could mean the destruction wrought by bookworms, fires, and biblioclasts, and\/or the consumption effected by textual transmission and reception more broadly.<\/p>\n

Accordingly, we have invited all approaches, including textual, art historical, codicological, and paleographical.\u00a0 Also invite subjects from all periods.\u00a0 Nice.<\/p>\n

\"\u00a9<\/a>

\u00a9 The British Library Board. Harley MS 628, folio 160 verso. Psalms 101 begin.<\/p><\/div>\n

Year 3 of Our Panels at the M-MLA<\/h3>\n

Thanks to the expert initiatives by our Associate Justin Hastings, this will be the 3rd year that the Research Group sponsors Permanent Panels at the Annual Convention of the Midwest Modern Language Association<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The plan to sponsor the 2018 Panels draws inspiration from the success of our Panels at the M-MLA in the past 2 years. Details here:<\/p>\n

2017<\/h3>\n

2017 M-MLA Panel<\/a> on “Artists, Activists, and Manuscript Evidence”
\n2017 M-MLA Panel Report<\/a><\/p>\n

2016<\/h3>\n

“Marginalia in Manuscripts and Books” for the 2016 M-MLA
\n<\/a>2016 M-MLA Report<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Chandelier<\/a>

“Seeing the Light”. Chandelier and Ceiling Murals at the Netherland Plaza Hotel.<\/p><\/div>\n

As customary for our Sessions at the International Congress on Medieval Studies<\/a>, we publish the Abstracts of the Papers for our Panels at the M-MLA Convention<\/a> in our Panel Announcements and Reports.<\/p>\n

*****<\/p>\n

The continuation of the tradition of Permanent Panels at the M-MLA Convention is most welcome, and we thank our organizer, Justin Hastings, and the Midwest Modern Language Association. We congratulate Justin for his expert organizational skills and outstanding collegiality, and we applaud his willingness to continue to organize the panels for the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence.<\/p>\n

*****<\/p>\n

\"\u00a9<\/a>

\u00a9 The British Library Board. Harley MS 628, folio 160 verso, detail. Psalm 101 begins with the initial ‘d’ for ‘Domini’.<\/p><\/div>\n

*****<\/p>\n

Program<\/h3>\n

Session 21. Friday 8:30\u20139:45 a.m.<\/p>\n

“Consuming Cultures and Manuscript Evidence”<\/h4>\n

Panel Sponsored by the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence
\nat the Midwest Modern Language Association Convention
\n15 November 2018<\/p>\n

Panel Chair:\u00a0 Justin Hastings<\/strong>, Loyola University Chicago<\/em><\/p>\n

[Note the recent change in Program, as the paper by Jessie McDowell will be replaced by Justin’s<\/em>]<\/p>\n

Chikako D. Kumamoto<\/strong>, College of DuPage<\/em>, Addison, Illinois
\n\u201c ‘The Press and the Fire’ and ‘Discretion’:
\nDistributing Cognition and Its Reception through Paratextual Apparatus in Print and Manuscript Culture”<\/p>\n

Abstract of Paper<\/a><\/p>\n

[Jessie McDowell<\/strong>, Loyola University Chicago<\/em><\/span>
\n“Medieval Manuscripts and Interoperability:<\/span>
\nScholarly Editing, Collaboration, and the Digital Artisan”]<\/span><\/p>\n

Justin Hastings<\/strong>, Loyola University Chicago
\n<\/em>“Hic Littera Patet:\u00a0 <\/em>Medieval Commentaries on Horace’s Satires <\/em>and Patterns of Textual Consumption”<\/p>\n

*****<\/p>\n

Further information about the Convention can be found on its website<\/a>. See also M-MLA Convention Permanent Section Call for Papers<\/a> .<\/p>\n

Please Contact Us<\/a> with your questions and suggestions. See you there!<\/p>\n

*****<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cConsuming Cultures and Manuscript Evidence\u201d 2018 Permanent Panel sponsored by the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence at the Midwest Modern Language Association (M-MLA) 2018 Convention Kansas City, Missouri November 15\u201318, 2018 [Posted on 30 August 2018, with updates, now with a change to the Program.\u00a0 Now see a newer version of this post: 2018 M-MLA […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10567,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[423,50,1507,1588,1],"tags":[1589,7],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11309"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11309"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11514,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11309\/revisions\/11514"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}