![\"\"](\"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Roy-17-E-iii-f-209r-cropped-251x300.png\")
London, British Library, MS Royal 17 E iii, fol. 209r, detail: illustration. Bartholomaeus Angelicus\u2019 De proprietatibus rerum, France (Paris?), 1st quarter of the 15th century.<\/p><\/div>\n
We launch a new Page in the History of the RGME Website by opening this Corner Kiosk, as a virtual Bulletin Board to share news about projects, conference papers, publications, and other activities by our Associates, Volunteers, Officers, Friends, and others in our community.\u00a0 Who are we? See:<\/p>\n
- \n
- Officers, Associates, and Volunteers<\/a><\/li>\n
- Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Not a member yet? Join the Friends!<\/p>\n
Thanks go to Zoey Kambour<\/strong>, our Intern Executive Assistant, for suggestions about this page, its contents, and its approach.<\/p>\n
Excited to get started.<\/p>\n
As another contribution for our RGME Anniversary Year<\/strong> of 2024, with its Theme of Bridges<\/a>, this Bulletin Board is designed as building a bridge between individual or group activities and our wider community.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Punte_Nuevo_Bridge_Ronda_-_Spain-768x1024.jpg\")
Ronda, Galicia, Spain, Puente Nuevo Bridge. Photograph 14 August 2007 by Mark Gilbert. Image: Judas6000 at English Wikipedia, CC BY 3.0 <https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons at https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Punte_Nuevo_Bridge,_Ronda_-_Spain.jpg.<\/p><\/div>\n
*****<\/p>\n
With the arrival of 2025, we continue this page with the addition of the year’s theme of Thresholds & Communities<\/a>. Thus we point to the door, portal, or gate which mark activities, projects, and publications or planned publications of our RGME Officers, Associates, Volunteers, and Friends.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Ca_dOro_facciata-via-Wikimedia-1024x899.jpg\")
Venice, Ca’ d’Oro, built for the Contarini family by Bartolomeo Bon in 1428-30: Facade. Photograph by Didier Descouens (10 May 2011), Image via Wikimedia Commons by Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.<\/p><\/div>\n
*****<\/p>\n
CFP: “Out of Bounds”<\/h1>\n
From our Associate Antony R. Henk<\/strong>, an announcement and a Call for Papers:<\/p>\n
Dear RGME colleagues,<\/p>\n
\n\n\nWe issue the call for papers for an upcoming English medieval studies volume in Anglo-Germanic Literary Studies<\/em> (Estudios Literarios Anglo-Germ\u00e1nicos<\/em>, Universidad de Ja\u00e9n). We are especially seeking contributions from graduate students and early-career researchers; established researchers are also fully welcome to contribute.<\/p>\n
Call for Papers<\/strong><\/p>\n
“Out of Bounds: Peripheral Texts of the English Middle Ages”<\/strong><\/p>\n
For over a century now, both the study and the teaching of medieval English have often orbited certain canonical landmarks: Beowulf<\/em> and Chaucer, \u00c6lfric and the Pearl <\/em>poet (cf. Baker 2012; Simpson\/David 2012; Treharne 2004). Yet, canonical works and authors make up only a tiny fraction of the corpus of Old and Middle English writing: outside of the invisible boundaries that a canon by necessity establishes, there lies a vast, largely uncharted textual landscape. A few representatives of these \u2018peripheral\u2019 or non-canonical texts in Old English might be the list-like Old English Menologium <\/em>(Karasawa 2021) and Secgan be <\/em>(Liebermann 1889; Foys et al. 2019), or linguistically and chronologically transitional works like The Old English Apollonius<\/em> (Treharne 2004), The Grave<\/em> (Bucholz 1890; Foys et al. 2019), or Durham<\/em> (Bjork 2014; Foys et al. 2019). In Middle English, one might denote as rather peripheral the early romance King Horn <\/em>(Drake\/Salisbury\/Herzman 1997) or Caxton\u2019s life of Charlemagne (Herrtage 1867). Furthermore, a significant portion of medieval English vernacular writing lies outside the aesthetics traditionally concomitant even to \u2018literature\u2019 itself. Non-literary texts\u2014lists, inventories, charters, liturgy, legal writings, didactic texts,\u00a0letters, marginalia, glosses, and more\u2014have only recently attracted scholarly notice. While these recent studies have advocated for the merits of the list as a literary form (von Contzen 2023) and explored short texts as varied as coin inscriptions, blessings, and manuscript marginalia (Lenker\/Kornexl 2019), little has been done to ask how and why such works are rejected for canonization or dismissed on aesthetic grounds.<\/p>\n
In light of continuing discussion on the problems of maintaining a traditional canon in studying and teaching medieval English (Heng 2024), crossing over into the peripheral or non-canonical texts of the English Middle Ages may provide an additional means of bringing in new perspectives and readings. Interrogating how and why these peripheral texts are adjudicated non-canonical may further allow a fuller understanding of the writings of the English Middle Ages\u00a0as a complex, nuanced, and interrelated whole.<\/p>\n
For a\u00a0new volume in the series Anglo-Germanic Literary Studies\u00a0<\/em>(Estudios Literarios Anglo-Germ\u00e1nicos<\/em>, Universidad de Ja\u00e9n) we are seeking contributions on peripheral or non-canonical medieval English texts, engaging with the following questions and topics:<\/p>\n
- \n
- What are the characteristics regarding form and content of writings which fall well outside the literary canon or which have not traditionally been regarded to be of high literary or aesthetic quality? What can we gain from engaging with such texts?<\/li>\n
- How might readings of peripheral texts (including those within a particular genre or group of texts, or of a particular date or dialect) shed light on contemporary medieval aesthetics, or on the current scholarly consensus, and how do they deepen or subvert our perspectives on canonical literature?<\/li>\n
- Can we trace developments and\/or continuities in the history of English Medieval Studies which (have) influence(d) the building of the canon edifice, and how can we ourselves defy them?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
We particularly encourage submissions from post-graduate students and early-career researchers. Abstracts of 250 words <\/strong>are to be submitted to medieval-english@rub.de<\/strong><\/a> by\u00a030\u00a0July 2025<\/strong>, with notice of acceptance following shortly thereafter. Accepted articles to the volume should not exceed 20 pages (max. 5,000 words, bibliography excluded). The deadline for full article submissions will be 2 February 2026<\/strong>.\u00a0All chapters\u00a0submitted for the volume will be subject to double-blind peer review<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
Contact<\/strong><\/p>\n
Antony R. Henk<\/strong>, PhD Assistant in English Medieval Studies, Ruhr University Bochum
\n&
\nKerstin Majewski<\/strong>, Junior Professor of English Medieval Studies, Ruhr University Bochum<\/p>\nE-mail: medieval-english@rub.de<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
*****<\/p>\n
New Website and Digital Edition:
\nMiddle English Text Series<\/h2>\nFrom our Associate Anna Siebach-Larsen<\/strong>, an annnouncement and a launch:<\/p>\n
The Middle English Text Series (METS) Editorial Board is pleased to announce the launch of a new website and digital edition for METS, a project long in the making. Join us to celebrate METS’ next phase with\u00a0<\/span>an online launch party on\u00a0<\/span>November 1, 2024, 3 pm EST<\/b>. We’ll introduce the site and some of its features, discuss future plans, and laud our collaborators. We look forward to celebrating with you!<\/u><\/u><\/p>\n
Please register here:\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/tinyurl.com\/
4w4df6ec<\/a>.<\/u><\/u><\/p>\n We are grateful to our sponsors and partners: University of Rochester\u2019s River Campus Libraries, Rossell Hope Robbins Library, and Department of English; TEAMS; Medieval Institute Publications; and the National\u00a0<\/span>Endowment for the Humanities.<\/p>\n
*****<\/p>\n
Middle Ages for Educators (MAFE):
\nSweet 16 Competition<\/h2>\nFirst up [that is, when we opened this page in September 2024], this announcement from our Associate Laura Morreale<\/strong>, who co-organizes the Medieval Women’s Networks<\/a> webinars which the RGME co-sponsors for October 17\u201318 2024 by Zoom.<\/p>\n
At Laura’s suggestion, we invite you to consider the competition proposed by the Princeton-based Middle Ages for Educators<\/a> (MAFE). The Princeton Directors<\/strong> for this initiative are our Associates Helmut Gneuss<\/strong> and Jack Tannous<\/strong>. Some RGME Associates have presented podcasts for this initiative, including Eric White<\/strong> and Pamela Patton<\/strong>, who recorded their podcasts at the Princeton University Library on the same day as our Director<\/strong>.\u00a0 We warmly applaud this initiative, and look forward to its further work.<\/p>\n
Sweet 16 Competition
\nfor Middle Ages for Educators (MAFE)<\/h2>\n\nWith the support of a Centennial Grant from the Medieval Academy of America<\/strong><\/a> (MAA<\/strong>), the Princeton-based Middle Ages for Educators (MAFE)<\/a> is sponsoring a bracketed Sweet16 competition<\/strong> to encourage medievalists to create open access resources <\/strong>(OARs<\/strong>) for inclusion and publication on the site.<\/p>\n
All Sweet 16 OAR submissions will be assessed by a panel of judges who will choose the top 16 OARs, which will then be entered into a public-facing competition. Voting for the best OAR will take place on social media, with the winner of each pairing advancing to the next round. The top 16 submissions will receive a cash prize, and the 4 semi-finalists will receive an additional cash prize and a travel stipend to present their work, along with the judges, at a round-table at the MAA’s Centennial meeting in Boston in March 2025<\/a>. The overall winner of the Sweet 16 competition will receive an additional prize of $1,000. Anyone may enter the competition.<\/p>\n
Guidelines for creating and submitting OARs are found on the Sweet 16 page of the MAFE site<\/a>; all submissions are due by October 1, 2024<\/b>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\nWe hope this competition will be an exciting opportunity for the medievalists in your community to learn about MAFE, to consider new ways to disseminate knowledge, and to represent your program and all you have to offer to the thousands of people who use MAFE every year.<\/p>\n
Please feel free to send me any questions or concerns you might have\u00a0(as MAFE Project Coordinator) at my personal email,\u00a0lmorreale3@gmail.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n
Remember the due date of 1 October 2024 for your submissions.<\/p>\n
*****<\/p>\n
Matters of Death and Life in Acre:
\nA New Publication<\/h2>\nAnother update for our Associate Laura Morreale<\/strong> and her collaborators.<\/p>\n
This time we celebrate the publication of this book:<\/p>\n
A Crusader’s Death and Life in Acre:<\/a>
\nThe 1266 Account-Inventory of Eudes of Nevers<\/em>,
\nby Anne E. Lester and Laura K. Morreale, with others
\nMedieval Societies, Religions and Cultures<\/a>
\n(Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2025).<\/strong><\/h3>\nAt a recent book-launch, it was possible to meet members of the team and their families, celebrate book-signings, and enjoy the company of authors, contributors, editors, reviewers, and colleagues in a welcoming setting. We give thanks for the hospitality and conviviality.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
We offer congratulations and look forward to the next collaborations!<\/p>\n
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/20250517_192159-768x1024.jpg\")
Book Launch for “A Crusader’s Death and Live at Acre,” with co-author Laura Morreale 18 May 2025). Photograph by Mildred Budny.<\/p><\/div>\n
*****<\/p>\n
Do you have announcements and news that you would like us to circulate? Please let us know.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\nContact Us<\/h2>\n
For information, please Contact Us<\/a> or write to\u00a0 director@manuscriptevidence.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n
For updates, please visit<\/p>\n
- \n
- our FaceBook Page<\/a><\/li>\n
- our Facebook Group<\/a><\/li>\n
- our Twitter Feed<\/a> (@rgme_mss)<\/li>\n
- our Bluesky<\/a> nest @rgmesocial.bluesky.social)<\/li>\n
- our LinkedIn Group<\/a><\/li>\n
- our Blog on Manuscript Studies<\/a> and its Contents List<\/a><\/li>\n
- Friends of the RGME<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
We look forward to hearing from you.<\/p>\n
*****<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Roy-17-E-iii-f-209r-cropped.png\")
London, British Library, MS Royal 17 E iii, fol. 209r, detail: illustration. Bartholomaeus Angelicus\u2019 De proprietatibus rerum, France (Paris?), 1st quarter of the 15th century.<\/p><\/div>\n
Note on the Image:\u00a0 On the manuscript, see Royal MS 17 E III<\/a>, the scholastic author Bartholomaeus Anglicus<\/a> (before 1203 \u2013 1272), and his widely circulated work De proprietatibus rerum<\/a>, “On the Properties of Things” (circa 1240), an early forerunner of the modern encyclopedia.<\/p>\n
*****<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
What RGME People are Doing Bulletin Board [Posted on 9 September 2024, with updates] We launch a new Page in the History of the RGME Website by opening this Corner Kiosk, as a virtual Bulletin Board to share news about projects, conference papers, publications, and other activities by our Associates, Volunteers, Officers, Friends, and others […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":19320,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/19317"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19317"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/19317\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20486,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/19317\/revisions\/20486"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19320"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscriptevidence.org\/wpme\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
- our Facebook Group<\/a><\/li>\n
- our FaceBook Page<\/a><\/li>\n
- Friends of the Research Group on Manuscript Evidence<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n